Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Delays in Follow-up Care for Abnormal Mammograms in Mobile Mammography Versus Fixed-Clinic Patients.
Vang, Suzanne S; Dunn, Alexandra; Margolies, Laurie R; Jandorf, Lina.
Afiliação
  • Vang SS; Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1077, New York, NY, 10029, USA. suzanne.vang@mssm.edu.
  • Dunn A; MD/MPH Program, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
  • Margolies LR; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and The Dubin Breast Center, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
  • Jandorf L; Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1077, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
J Gen Intern Med ; 37(7): 1619-1625, 2022 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35212876
BACKGROUND: Mobile mammographic services (MM) have been shown to increase breast cancer screening in medically underserved women. However, little is known about MM patients' adherence to follow-up of abnormal mammograms and how this compares with patients from traditional, fixed clinics. OBJECTIVES: To assess delays in follow-up of abnormal mammograms in women screened using MM versus fixed clinics. DESIGN: Electronic medical record review of abnormal screening mammograms. SUBJECTS: Women screened on a MM van or at a fixed clinic with an abnormal radiographic result in 2019 (N = 1,337). MAIN MEASURES: Our outcome was delay in follow-up of an abnormal mammogram of 60 days or greater. Guided by Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization, we assessed the following: predisposing (age, ethnicity, marital status, preferred language), enabling (insurance, provider referral, clinic site), and need (personal breast cancer history, family history of breast/ovarian cancer) factors. KEY RESULTS: Only 45% of MM patients had obtained recommended follow-up within 60 days of an abnormal screening compared to 72% of fixed-site patients (p < .001). After adjusting for predisposing, enabling, and need factors, MM patients were 2.1 times more likely to experience follow-up delays than fixed-site patients (CI: 1.5-3.1; p < .001). African American (OR: 1.5; CI: 1.0-2.1; p < .05) and self-referred (OR: 1.8; CI: 1.2-2.8; p < .01) women were significantly more likely to experience delays compared to Non-Hispanic White women or women with a provider referral, respectively. Women who were married (OR: 0.63; CI: 0.5-0.9; p < .01), had breast cancer previously (OR: 0.37; CI: 0.2-0.8; p < .05), or had a family history of breast/ovarian cancer (OR: 0.76; CI: 0.6-0.9; p < .05) were less likely to experience delayed care compared to unmarried women, women with no breast cancer history, or women without a family history of breast/ovarian cancer, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of women screened using MM had follow-up delays. Women who are African American, self-referred, or unmarried are particularly at risk of experiencing delays in care for an abnormal mammogram.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Neoplasias da Mama Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gen Intern Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Neoplasias da Mama Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gen Intern Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos