Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stereotactic radiotherapy for spinal hemangioblastoma - disease control and volume analysis in long-term follow up.
Cvek, Jakub; Knybel, Lukas; Reguli, Stefan; Lipina, Radim; Hanzlikova, Pavla; Silhán, Petr; Resova, Kamila; Blazek, Tomas; Palicka, Martin; Feltl, David.
Afiliação
  • Cvek J; Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
  • Knybel L; Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
  • Reguli S; Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
  • Lipina R; Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
  • Hanzlikova P; Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
  • Silhán P; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
  • Resova K; Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
  • Blazek T; Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
  • Palicka M; Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
  • Feltl D; Department of Oncology, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother ; 27(1): 134-141, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35402025
ABSTRACT

Background:

This retrospective analysis evaluated the long-term outcome of spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment for hemangioblastomas. Materials and

methods:

Between 2010 and 2018, 5 patients with 18 Von-Hippel Lindau-related pial-based spinal hemangioblastomas were treated with fractionated SBRT. After precisely registering images of all relevant datasets, we delineated the gross tumor volume, spinal cord (including intramedullary cysts and/or syrinxes), and past radiotherapy regions. A sequential optimization algorithm was used for dose determinations, and patients received 25-26 Gy in five fractions or 24 Gy in three fractions. On-line image guidance, based on spinal bone structures, and two orthogonal radiographs were provided. The actuarial nidus control, surgery-free survival, cyst/syrinx changes, and progression-free survival were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0.

Results:

The median follow-up was 5 years after SBRT. Patients displayed one nidus progression, one need of neurosurgery, and two cyst/syrinx progressions directly connected to symptom worsening. No SBRT-related complications or acute adverse radiation-related events occurred. However, one asymptomatic radiological sign of myelopathy occurred two years after SBRT. All tumors regressed; the one-year equivalent tumor volume reduction was 0.2 mL and the median volume significantly decreased by 28% (p = 0.012). Tumor volume reductions were not correlated with the mean (p = 0.19) or maximum (p = 0.16) dose.

Conclusions:

SBRT for pial-based spinal hemangioblastomas was an effective, safe, viable alternative to neurosurgery in asymptomatic patients. Escalating doses above the conventional dose-volume limits of spinal cord tolerance showed no additional benefit.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: República Tcheca

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: República Tcheca