Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The safety profile of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy in glioblastoma patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts.
Oberheim-Bush, Nancy Ann; Shi, Wenyin; McDermott, Michael W; Grote, Alexander; Stindl, Julia; Lustgarten, Leonardo.
Afiliação
  • Oberheim-Bush NA; Division of Neuro-Oncology, UCSF Brain Tumor Center, University of California, 400 Parnassus Ave, A808, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. nancyann.oberheimbush@ucsf.edu.
  • Shi W; Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • McDermott MW; Division of Neurosurgery, Miami Neuroscience Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Grote A; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
  • Stindl J; Medical Safety, Novocure GmbH, Munich, Germany.
  • Lustgarten L; Director of Neurooncology Global Medical Affairs , Novocure Inc, New York, NY, USA.
J Neurooncol ; 158(3): 453-461, 2022 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35639236
INTRODUCTION: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields, 200 kHz) therapy is a noninvasive, locoregional cancer treatment approved for use in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), recurrent GBM, and malignant pleural mesothelioma. GBM patients with hydrocephalus may require implantation of a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt, however, the current TTFields therapy label does not include the use of VP shunts in GBM patients due to insufficient safety data. This analysis evaluates the safety of TTFields therapy use in this population. METHODS: Unsolicited post-marketing global surveillance data from patients with GBM and a VP shunt (programmable/non-programmable) who received TTFields therapy between November 2012-April 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities version 24.0. RESULTS: Overall, 156 patients with VP shunts were identified and included in this analysis. In total, 77% reported ≥ 1 AE; the most common TTFields therapy-related AEs were non-serious and localized, beneath-array skin AEs (43%). The incidence and categories of AEs were comparable between patients with or without VP shunts. Six patients with VP shunts experienced seven serious TTFields therapy-related AEs: skin erosion at the shunt site (n = 3); wound dehiscence at the shunt site (n = 2) and at the resection scar (n = 2). No shunt malfunctions were deemed related to TTFields therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In the real-world setting, TTFields therapy in GBM patients with VP shunts demonstrated good tolerability and a favorable safety profile. There was no evidence that TTFields therapy disrupted VP shunt effectiveness. These results suggest TTFields therapy may be safely used in patients with VP shunts.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Glioblastoma / Hidrocefalia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neurooncol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Glioblastoma / Hidrocefalia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neurooncol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos