Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mercury contamination and potential health risks to Arctic seabirds and shorebirds.
Chastel, Olivier; Fort, Jérôme; Ackerman, Joshua T; Albert, Céline; Angelier, Frédéric; Basu, Niladri; Blévin, Pierre; Brault-Favrou, Maud; Bustnes, Jan Ove; Bustamante, Paco; Danielsen, Jóhannis; Descamps, Sébastien; Dietz, Rune; Erikstad, Kjell Einar; Eulaers, Igor; Ezhov, Alexey; Fleishman, Abram B; Gabrielsen, Geir W; Gavrilo, Maria; Gilchrist, Grant; Gilg, Olivier; Gíslason, Sindri; Golubova, Elena; Goutte, Aurélie; Grémillet, David; Hallgrimsson, Gunnar T; Hansen, Erpur S; Hanssen, Sveinn Are; Hatch, Scott; Huffeldt, Nicholas P; Jakubas, Dariusz; Jónsson, Jón Einar; Kitaysky, Alexander S; Kolbeinsson, Yann; Krasnov, Yuri; Letcher, Robert J; Linnebjerg, Jannie F; Mallory, Mark; Merkel, Flemming Ravn; Moe, Børge; Montevecchi, William J; Mosbech, Anders; Olsen, Bergur; Orben, Rachael A; Provencher, Jennifer F; Ragnarsdottir, Sunna B; Reiertsen, Tone K; Rojek, Nora; Romano, Marc; Søndergaard, Jens.
Afiliação
  • Chastel O; Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC), UMR 7372 CNRS- La Rochelle Université, 79360 Villiers-en-Bois, France. Electronic address: olivier.chastel@cebc.cnrs.fr.
  • Fort J; Littoral Environnement et Sociétés (LIENSs), UMR 7266 CNRS-La Rochelle Université, 17000 La Rochelle, France. Electronic address: jerome.fort@univ-lr.fr.
  • Ackerman JT; U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, 800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, CA 95620, United States. Electronic address: jackerman@usgs.gov.
  • Albert C; Littoral Environnement et Sociétés (LIENSs), UMR 7266 CNRS-La Rochelle Université, 17000 La Rochelle, France.
  • Angelier F; Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC), UMR 7372 CNRS- La Rochelle Université, 79360 Villiers-en-Bois, France.
  • Basu N; McGill University, Faculty of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Montreal, QC H9X 3V9, Canada.
  • Blévin P; Akvaplan-niva AS, FRAM Centre, 9296 Tromsø, Norway.
  • Brault-Favrou M; Littoral Environnement et Sociétés (LIENSs), UMR 7266 CNRS-La Rochelle Université, 17000 La Rochelle, France.
  • Bustnes JO; Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, FRAM Centre, 9296 Tromsø, Norway.
  • Bustamante P; Littoral Environnement et Sociétés (LIENSs), UMR 7266 CNRS-La Rochelle Université, 17000 La Rochelle, France; Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), 75005 Paris, France.
  • Danielsen J; Faroe Marine Research Institute, 100 Tórshavn, Faroe Islands.
  • Descamps S; Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram center, 9296 Tromsø, Norway.
  • Dietz R; Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
  • Erikstad KE; Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, FRAM Centre, 9296 Tromsø, Norway.
  • Eulaers I; Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram center, 9296 Tromsø, Norway; Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
  • Ezhov A; Murmansk Marine Biological Institute Russian Academy of Science, 183010 Vladimirskaya str. 17 Murmansk, Russia.
  • Fleishman AB; Conservation Metrics, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, United States of America.
  • Gabrielsen GW; Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram center, 9296 Tromsø, Norway.
  • Gavrilo M; Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, 199397 St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Gilchrist G; Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Wildlife Research Centre, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Raven Road, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ont., Canada K1A 0H3.
  • Gilg O; Laboratoire Chrono-environnement, UMR 6249, Université de Bourgogne Franche Comté, 25000 Besançon, France; Groupe de Recherche en Ecologie Arctique, 16 rue de Vernot, F-21440 Francheville, France.
  • Gíslason S; Southwest Iceland Nature Research Centre, Gardvegur 1, 245 Sudurnesjabaer, Iceland.
  • Golubova E; Laboratory of Ornithology, Institute of Biological Problems of the North, RU-685000 Magadan, Portovaya Str., 18, Russia.
  • Goutte A; EPHE, PSL Research University, UMR 7619 METIS, F-75005 Paris, France.
  • Grémillet D; Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE), UMR 5175 Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France,; Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.
  • Hallgrimsson GT; Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland.
  • Hansen ES; South Iceland Nature Research Centre, Ægisgata 2, 900 Vestmannaeyjar, Iceland.
  • Hanssen SA; Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, 0855 Oslo, Norway.
  • Hatch S; Institute for Seabird Research and Conservation, Anchorage, 99516-3185, AK, USA.
  • Huffeldt NP; Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark; Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, 3900 Nuuk, Greenland.
  • Jakubas D; Department of Vertebrate Ecology and Zoology, University of Gdansk, 80-308 Gdansk, Poland.
  • Jónsson JE; University of Iceland's Research Center at Snæfellsnes, 340 Stykkishólmur, Iceland.
  • Kitaysky AS; University of Alaska Fairbanks, Institute of Arctic Biology, Department of Biology & Wildlife, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7000, United States of America.
  • Kolbeinsson Y; Northeast Iceland Nature Research Centre, 640 Húsavík, Iceland.
  • Krasnov Y; Murmansk Marine Biological Institute Russian Academy of Science, 183010 Vladimirskaya str. 17 Murmansk, Russia.
  • Letcher RJ; Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Wildlife Research Centre, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Raven Road, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ont., Canada K1A 0H3.
  • Linnebjerg JF; Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
  • Mallory M; Biology, Acadia University Wolfville, Nova Scotia B4P 2R6, Canada.
  • Merkel FR; Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark; Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, 3900 Nuuk, Greenland.
  • Moe B; Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, 7485 Trondheim, Norway.
  • Montevecchi WJ; Memorial Univerisity of Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John's, Newoundland A1C 3X9, Canada.
  • Mosbech A; Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
  • Olsen B; Faroe Marine Reseaqrch Institute, Nóatún 1, FO-110 Tórshavn, Faroe Islands.
  • Orben RA; Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Newport, OR, USA.
  • Provencher JF; Science & Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0H3.
  • Ragnarsdottir SB; Icelandic Institute of Natural History, 600 Akureyri, Iceland.
  • Reiertsen TK; Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, FRAM Centre, 9296 Tromsø, Norway.
  • Rojek N; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alaska Maritime Wildlife Refuge, Homer, AK, USA.
  • Romano M; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alaska Maritime Wildlife Refuge, Homer, AK, USA.
  • Søndergaard J; Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
Sci Total Environ ; 844: 156944, 2022 Oct 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35752241
ABSTRACT
Since the last Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) effort to review biological effects of mercury (Hg) on Arctic biota in 2011 and 2018, there has been a considerable number of new Arctic bird studies. This review article provides contemporary Hg exposure and potential health risk for 36 Arctic seabird and shorebird species, representing a larger portion of the Arctic than during previous AMAP assessments now also including parts of the Russian Arctic. To assess risk to birds, we used Hg toxicity benchmarks established for blood and converted to egg, liver, and feather tissues. Several Arctic seabird populations showed Hg concentrations that exceeded toxicity benchmarks, with 50 % of individual birds exceeding the "no adverse health effect" level. In particular, 5 % of all studied birds were considered to be at moderate or higher risk to Hg toxicity. However, most seabirds (95 %) were generally at lower risk to Hg toxicity. The highest Hg contamination was observed in seabirds breeding in the western Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Most Arctic shorebirds exhibited low Hg concentrations, with approximately 45 % of individuals categorized at no risk, 2.5 % at high risk category, and no individual at severe risk. Although the majority Arctic-breeding seabirds and shorebirds appeared at lower risk to Hg toxicity, recent studies have reported deleterious effects of Hg on some pituitary hormones, genotoxicity, and reproductive performance. Adult survival appeared unaffected by Hg exposure, although long-term banding studies incorporating Hg are still limited. Although Hg contamination across the Arctic is considered low for most bird species, Hg in combination with other stressors, including other contaminants, diseases, parasites, and climate change, may still cause adverse effects. Future investigations on the global impact of Hg on Arctic birds should be conducted within a multi-stressor framework. This information helps to address Article 22 (Effectiveness Evaluation) of the Minamata Convention on Mercury as a global pollutant.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mercúrio Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mercúrio Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article