Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Efficacy of Local and General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
Gao, Lulu; Jin, Baihan; Chao, Ce; Wang, Bin; Zhang, Xiaoying; Shen, Jiang.
Afiliação
  • Gao L; Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213000, China. 871758700@qq.com.
  • Jin B; NO.971 Hospital of The People's Liberation Army Navy, China. 871758700@qq.com.
  • Chao C; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213000, China. 871758700@qq.com.
  • Wang B; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213000, China. 871758700@qq.com.
  • Zhang X; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213000, China. 871758700@qq.com.
  • Shen J; Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213000, China. 871758700@qq.com.
Heart Surg Forum ; 25(3): E364-E373, 2022 May 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35787764
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the potential effects of local anesthesia (LA) and general anesthesia (GA) for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). MEASUREMENTS All relevant studies were searched from Pubmed, EMbase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library (January 1, 2016, to June 1, 2021). The main outcomes of this literature meta-analysis were 30-day mortality, procedural time, new pacemaker implantation, total stay in the hospital, use of the vasoactive drug, and intra-and postoperative complications and emergencies, including conversion to open, myocardial infarction, pulmonary complication, vascular complication, renal injury/failure, stroke, transesophageal echocardiography, life-threatening/major bleeding, cardiac tamponade, and emergency PCI. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) together with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS:

A total of 17 studies, including 20938 patients, in the final analysis, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Intra-and postoperative complications (myocardial infarction, vascular complication, renal injury/failure, stroke, and cardiac tamponade) undergoing TAVI in severe AS patients under GA do not offer a significant difference compared with LA. No differences were observed between LA and GA for new pacemaker implantation, total stay in the hospital, transesophageal echocardiography, and emergency PCI. LA has lower mortality compared with GA (RR 0.69, P = 0.600), pulmonary complications (RR 0.54, P = 0.278), life-threatening/major bleeding (RR 0.85, P = 0.855), and lower times of conversion to open (RR 0.22, P = 0.746). LA has many advantages, including a shorter procedure duration (MD=-0.38, P = 0.000) and reduction of the use of the vasoactive drug (RR 0.57, P = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS:

For TAVI, both LA with or without sedation and GA are feasible and safe. LA appears a feasible alternative to GA for AS patients undergoing TAVI.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter / Anestesia Geral / Anestesia Local Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Heart Surg Forum Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter / Anestesia Geral / Anestesia Local Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Heart Surg Forum Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China