Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma Patients Not Eligible for Stem Cell Transplant.
Chiu, May; Hague, Samuel; Elinder-Camburn, Anna; Merriman, Eileen; Chan, Henry.
Afiliação
  • Chiu M; Waitemata District Health Board, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. Electronic address: mchiu.research@gmail.com.
  • Hague S; Waitemata District Health Board, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Elinder-Camburn A; Waitemata District Health Board, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Merriman E; Waitemata District Health Board, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Chan H; Waitemata District Health Board, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 22(11): 835-840, 2022 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35915036
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Gemcitabine-based regimens are effective salvage therapy for RR lymphoma patients eligible for ASCT, but there is limited data in transplant-ineligible (TIE) patients. Here, we present a retrospective analysis on the outcome of TIE adult patients with RR lymphoma treated with gemcitabine, cisplatin or carboplatin and dexamethasone (GDP/GDCarboP) +/- rituximab regimen in our center. PATIENTS We identified 33 patients 54.5% diffuse large Bcell lymphoma (DLBCL), 6.1% double/triple hit lymphoma, 15% follicular lymphoma, 18% T-cell lymphoma, and 6% classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Majority of the patients had advanced-stage disease and raised LDH at relapse. The cohort's median age was 71 years. The median number of prior lines of treatment was 2, and 60.6% were refractory to their last line of treatment.

RESULTS:

The overall response rate was 33% (complete response 15%) for the entire cohort and 62.5% for DLBCL patients not refractory to prior line of treatment. At median follow-up of 25 months, the median duration of response and overall survival in the responders were not reached. Conversely, the median overall survival for the non-responders was dismal at 5 months. Fifty-five percent required treatment alteration (dose attenuation or omission and treatment delay for >1 week) due to adverse events, 73% needed transfusion, and 70% had at least 1 hospital admission during treatment.

CONCLUSION:

Our real-world data showed that GDP/GDCarboP provides meaningful efficacy and durability, especially among the responders. However, dose modification and inpatient support are frequently needed, indicating the need for good supportive care and close follow-up in this frailer population.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linfoma não Hodgkin / Linfoma de Células B / Linfoma Folicular Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linfoma não Hodgkin / Linfoma de Células B / Linfoma Folicular Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article