Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Barriers to abortion provision in primary care in New England, 2019-2020: A qualitative study.
Lee, Charlotte M; Johns, Sarah L; Stulberg, Debra B; Allen, Rebecca H; Janiak, Elizabeth.
Afiliação
  • Lee CM; Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. Electronic address: charlotte.m.lee@gmail.com.
  • Johns SL; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Stulberg DB; University of Chicago, Department of Family Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Allen RH; Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Women and Infants Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Providence, RI, USA.
  • Janiak E; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Contraception ; 117: 39-44, 2023 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35970423
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess barriers to and facilitators of abortion provision among abortion-trained primary care providers. STUDY

DESIGN:

We conducted 21 qualitative in-depth interviews with 20 abortion-trained family physicians and one internal medicine physician in five New England states. We dual-coded interviews, using a consensus method to agree upon final coding schema. Through iterative dialogue, using an inductive content analysis approach, we synthesized the themes and identified patterns within each domain of inquiry.

RESULTS:

The most commonly reported barriers were a lack of organizational support, the Hyde Amendment, which prevents the use of federal funds for most abortion care, and the mifepristone Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, a federal regulation which prohibits routine mifepristone pharmacy dispensing. The logistical barriers created by these policies require cooperation from additional stakeholders, creating more opportunities for abortion stigma and moral opposition to arise. Other salient barriers included inter-specialty tension (particularly with obstetrician-gynecologists), perceived need for pre-abortion ultrasound, absence of a clinician support network, and lack of knowledge of existing resources for establishing abortion care in primary care.

CONCLUSIONS:

Increased abortion provision in primary care is one of many necessary responses to the human rights crisis produced by the Dobbs decision. Eliminating the Hyde Amendment and ending federal regulations restricting pharmacy dispensing of mifepristone are key interventions to address barriers to primary care abortion provision. Building interspecialty partnerships between family medicine and OB/GYN and spreading awareness of the evidence-based ultrasound-as-needed protocol and other educational resources are also likely to increase primary care abortion access. IMPLICATIONS By exploring barriers to and facilitators of primary care abortion provision, this study outlines a targeted approach to support increased access to abortions. In states with legal abortion post-Roe, it is important that motivated and trained primary care providers can offer abortions, rather than referring patients to overburdened specialty clinics.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mifepristona / Aborto Induzido Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Contraception Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mifepristona / Aborto Induzido Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Contraception Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article