Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Process-oriented analysis of dominant sources of uncertainty in the land carbon sink.
O'Sullivan, Michael; Friedlingstein, Pierre; Sitch, Stephen; Anthoni, Peter; Arneth, Almut; Arora, Vivek K; Bastrikov, Vladislav; Delire, Christine; Goll, Daniel S; Jain, Atul; Kato, Etsushi; Kennedy, Daniel; Knauer, Jürgen; Lienert, Sebastian; Lombardozzi, Danica; McGuire, Patrick C; Melton, Joe R; Nabel, Julia E M S; Pongratz, Julia; Poulter, Benjamin; Séférian, Roland; Tian, Hanqin; Vuichard, Nicolas; Walker, Anthony P; Yuan, Wenping; Yue, Xu; Zaehle, Sönke.
Afiliação
  • O'Sullivan M; College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QF, UK. m.osullivan@exeter.ac.uk.
  • Friedlingstein P; College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QF, UK.
  • Sitch S; Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, CNRS-ENS-UPMC-X, Paris, France.
  • Anthoni P; College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4RJ, UK.
  • Arneth A; Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research/Atmospheric Environmental Research, 82467, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
  • Arora VK; Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research/Atmospheric Environmental Research, 82467, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
  • Bastrikov V; Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Climate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Victoria, BC, Canada.
  • Delire C; Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
  • Goll DS; CNRM, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France.
  • Jain A; Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
  • Kato E; Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61821, USA.
  • Kennedy D; Institute of Applied Energy (IAE), Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0003, Japan.
  • Knauer J; National Center for Atmospheric Research, Climate and Global Dynamics, Terrestrial Sciences Section, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA.
  • Lienert S; Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
  • Lombardozzi D; CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Canberra, ACT, 2101, Australia.
  • McGuire PC; Climate and Environmental Physics, Physics Institute and Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Melton JR; National Center for Atmospheric Research, Climate and Global Dynamics, Terrestrial Sciences Section, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA.
  • Nabel JEMS; Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
  • Pongratz J; Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Climate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Victoria, BC, Canada.
  • Poulter B; Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Bundesstr. 53, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Séférian R; Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany.
  • Tian H; Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Bundesstr. 53, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Vuichard N; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Luisenstr. 37, 80333, München, Germany.
  • Walker AP; NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Biospheric Sciences Laboratory, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA.
  • Yuan W; CNRM, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France.
  • Yue X; Schiller Institute for Integrated Science and Society, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA.
  • Zaehle S; Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Nat Commun ; 13(1): 4781, 2022 08 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35970991
The observed global net land carbon sink is captured by current land models. All models agree that atmospheric CO2 and nitrogen deposition driven gains in carbon stocks are partially offset by climate and land-use and land-cover change (LULCC) losses. However, there is a lack of consensus in the partitioning of the sink between vegetation and soil, where models do not even agree on the direction of change in carbon stocks over the past 60 years. This uncertainty is driven by plant productivity, allocation, and turnover response to atmospheric CO2 (and to a smaller extent to LULCC), and the response of soil to LULCC (and to a lesser extent climate). Overall, differences in turnover explain ~70% of model spread in both vegetation and soil carbon changes. Further analysis of internal plant and soil (individual pools) cycling is needed to reduce uncertainty in the controlling processes behind the global land carbon sink.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dióxido de Carbono / Sequestro de Carbono Idioma: En Revista: Nat Commun Assunto da revista: BIOLOGIA / CIENCIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dióxido de Carbono / Sequestro de Carbono Idioma: En Revista: Nat Commun Assunto da revista: BIOLOGIA / CIENCIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article