Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
OpenKBP-Opt: an international and reproducible evaluation of 76 knowledge-based planning pipelines.
Babier, Aaron; Mahmood, Rafid; Zhang, Binghao; Alves, Victor G L; Barragán-Montero, Ana Maria; Beaudry, Joel; Cardenas, Carlos E; Chang, Yankui; Chen, Zijie; Chun, Jaehee; Diaz, Kelly; David Eraso, Harold; Faustmann, Erik; Gaj, Sibaji; Gay, Skylar; Gronberg, Mary; Guo, Bingqi; He, Junjun; Heilemann, Gerd; Hira, Sanchit; Huang, Yuliang; Ji, Fuxin; Jiang, Dashan; Carlo Jimenez Giraldo, Jean; Lee, Hoyeon; Lian, Jun; Liu, Shuolin; Liu, Keng-Chi; Marrugo, José; Miki, Kentaro; Nakamura, Kunio; Netherton, Tucker; Nguyen, Dan; Nourzadeh, Hamidreza; Osman, Alexander F I; Peng, Zhao; Darío Quinto Muñoz, José; Ramsl, Christian; Joo Rhee, Dong; David Rodriguez, Juan; Shan, Hongming; Siebers, Jeffrey V; Soomro, Mumtaz H; Sun, Kay; Usuga Hoyos, Andrés; Valderrama, Carlos; Verbeek, Rob; Wang, Enpei; Willems, Siri; Wu, Qi.
Afiliação
  • Babier A; Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Mahmood R; Vector Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Zhang B; Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Alves VGL; Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Barragán-Montero AM; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America.
  • Beaudry J; Department of Molecular Imaging Radiation Oncology, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
  • Cardenas CE; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
  • Chang Y; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
  • Chen Z; Department of Engineering and Applied Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
  • Chun J; Shenying Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
  • Diaz K; Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • David Eraso H; Department of Physics, National University of Colombia, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Faustmann E; Department of Physics, National University of Colombia, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Gaj S; Atominstitut, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
  • Gay S; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
  • Gronberg M; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  • Guo B; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  • He J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
  • Heilemann G; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
  • Hira S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Huang Y; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
  • Ji F; Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  • Jiang D; Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Anhui University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
  • Carlo Jimenez Giraldo J; Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Anhui University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
  • Lee H; Department of Physics, National University of Colombia, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Lian J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
  • Liu S; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
  • Liu KC; Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Anhui University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
  • Marrugo J; Department of Medical Imaging, Taiwan AI Labs, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Miki K; Department of Physics, National University of Colombia, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Nakamura K; Department Of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Netherton T; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
  • Nguyen D; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  • Nourzadeh H; Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
  • Osman AFI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
  • Peng Z; Department of Medical Physics, Al-Neelain University, Khartoum, Sudan.
  • Darío Quinto Muñoz J; Department of Engineering and Applied Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
  • Ramsl C; Department of Physics, National University of Colombia, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Joo Rhee D; Atominstitut, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
  • David Rodriguez J; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  • Shan H; Department of Physics, National University of Colombia, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Siebers JV; Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
  • Soomro MH; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America.
  • Sun K; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America.
  • Usuga Hoyos A; Studio Vodels, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
  • Valderrama C; Department of Physics, National University of Colombia, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Verbeek R; Department of Physics, National University of Colombia, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Wang E; Department Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
  • Willems S; Shenying Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
  • Wu Q; Department of Electrical Engineering, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Phys Med Biol ; 67(18)2022 09 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36093921
ABSTRACT
Objective.To establish an open framework for developing plan optimization models for knowledge-based planning (KBP).Approach.Our framework includes radiotherapy treatment data (i.e. reference plans) for 100 patients with head-and-neck cancer who were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. That data also includes high-quality dose predictions from 19 KBP models that were developed by different research groups using out-of-sample data during the OpenKBP Grand Challenge. The dose predictions were input to four fluence-based dose mimicking models to form 76 unique KBP pipelines that generated 7600 plans (76 pipelines × 100 patients). The predictions and KBP-generated plans were compared to the reference plans via the dose score, which is the average mean absolute voxel-by-voxel difference in dose; the deviation in dose-volume histogram (DVH) points; and the frequency of clinical planning criteria satisfaction. We also performed a theoretical investigation to justify our dose mimicking models.Main results.The range in rank order correlation of the dose score between predictions and their KBP pipelines was 0.50-0.62, which indicates that the quality of the predictions was generally positively correlated with the quality of the plans. Additionally, compared to the input predictions, the KBP-generated plans performed significantly better (P< 0.05; one-sided Wilcoxon test) on 18 of 23 DVH points. Similarly, each optimization model generated plans that satisfied a higher percentage of criteria than the reference plans, which satisfied 3.5% more criteria than the set of all dose predictions. Lastly, our theoretical investigation demonstrated that the dose mimicking models generated plans that are also optimal for an inverse planning model.Significance.This was the largest international effort to date for evaluating the combination of KBP prediction and optimization models. We found that the best performing models significantly outperformed the reference dose and dose predictions. In the interest of reproducibility, our data and code is freely available.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Phys Med Biol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Phys Med Biol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá