Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Antigen Retrieval on Genomic DNA From Immunodissected Samples.
Johann, Donald J; Shin, Ik Jae; Roberge, Adam; Laun, Sarah; Peterson, Erich A; Liu, Meei; Steliga, Matthew A; Muesse, Jason; Emmert-Buck, Michael R; Tangrea, Michael A.
Afiliação
  • Johann DJ; Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
  • Shin IJ; Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
  • Roberge A; Avoneaux Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Laun S; Avoneaux Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Peterson EA; Alvin & Lois Lapidus Cancer Institute, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, LifeBridge Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Liu M; Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
  • Steliga MA; Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
  • Muesse J; Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
  • Emmert-Buck MR; Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
  • Tangrea MA; Avoneaux Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Histochem Cytochem ; 70(9): 643-658, 2022 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36129255
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining is an established technique for visualizing proteins in tissue sections for research studies and clinical applications. IHC is increasingly used as a targeting strategy for procurement of labeled cells via tissue microdissection, including immunodissection, computer-aided laser dissection (CALD), expression microdissection (xMD), and other techniques. The initial antigen retrieval (AR) process increases epitope availability and improves staining characteristics; however, the procedure can damage DNA. To better understand the effects of AR on DNA quality and quantity in immunodissected samples, both clinical specimens (KRAS gene mutation positive cases) and model system samples (lung cancer patient-derived xenograft tissue) were subjected to commonly employed AR methods (heat induced epitope retrieval [HIER], protease digestion) and the effects on DNA were assessed by Qubit, fragment analysis, quantitative PCR, digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), library preparation, and targeted sequencing. The data showed that HIER resulted in optimal IHC staining characteristics, but induced significant damage to DNA, producing extensive fragmentation and decreased overall yields. However, neither of the AR methods combined with IHC prevented ddPCR amplification of small amplicons and gene mutations were successfully identified from immunodissected clinical samples. The results indicate for the first time that DNA recovered from immunostained slides after standard AR and IHC processing can be successfully employed for genomic mutation analysis via ddPCR and next-generation sequencing (NGS) short-read methods.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras) / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Histochem Cytochem Assunto da revista: HISTOCITOQUIMICA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras) / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Histochem Cytochem Assunto da revista: HISTOCITOQUIMICA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article