Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized controlled trial for evaluating the impact of integrating a computerized clinical decision support system and a socially assistive humanoid robot into grand rounds during pre/post-operative care.
Mlakar, Izidor; Smrke, Urska; Flis, Vojko; Bergauer, Andrej; Kobilica, Nina; Kampic, Tadej; Horvat, Samo; Vidovic, Damjan; Musil, Bojan; Plohl, Nejc.
Afiliação
  • Mlakar I; Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
  • Smrke U; Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
  • Flis V; University Clinical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
  • Bergauer A; University Clinical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
  • Kobilica N; University Clinical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
  • Kampic T; University Clinical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
  • Horvat S; University Clinical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
  • Vidovic D; University Clinical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
  • Musil B; Faculty of Arts, Department of Psychology, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
  • Plohl N; Faculty of Arts, Department of Psychology, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Digit Health ; 8: 20552076221129068, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36185391
ABSTRACT
Although clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are increasingly emphasized as one of the possible levers for improving care, they are still not widely used due to different barriers, such as doubts about systems' performance, their complexity and poor design, practitioners' lack of time to use them, poor computer skills, reluctance to use them in front of patients, and deficient integration into existing workflows. While several studies on CDSS exist, there is a need for additional high-quality studies using large samples and examining the differences between outcomes following a decision based on CDSS support and those following decisions without this kind of information. Even less is known about the effectiveness of a CDSS that is delivered during a grand round routine and with the help of socially assistive humanoid robots (SAHRs). In this study, 200 patients will be randomized into a Control Group (i.e. standard care) and an Intervention Group (i.e. standard care and novel CDSS delivered via a SAHR). Health care quality and Quality of Life measures will be compared between the two groups. Additionally, approximately 22 clinicians, who are also active researchers at the University Clinical Center Maribor, will evaluate the acceptability and clinical usability of the system. The results of the proposed study will provide high-quality evidence on the effectiveness of CDSS systems and SAHR in the grand round routine.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Digit Health Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Eslovênia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Digit Health Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Eslovênia