Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An umbrella review and meta-analysis of renin-angiotensin system drugs use and COVID-19 outcomes.
Kurdi, Amanj; Mueller, Tanja; Weir, Natalie.
Afiliação
  • Kurdi A; Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
  • Mueller T; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Kurdistan Region Government, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.
  • Weir N; Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 53(2): e13888, 2023 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36205627
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite the availability of extensive literature on the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) on COVID-19 outcomes, the evidence is still controversial. We aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the effect of ACEIs/ARBs on COVID-19-related outcomes by summarising the currently available evidence.

METHODS:

An umbrella review was conducted using Medline (OVID), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane library and medRxiv from inception to 1 February 2021. Systematic reviews with meta-analysis that evaluated the effect of ACEIs/ARBs on COVID-19-related clinical outcomes were eligible. Studies' quality was appraised using the AMSTAR 2 Critical Appraisal Tool. Data were analysed using the random-effects modelling including several subgroup analyses. Heterogenicity was assessed using I2 statistic. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021233398) and reported using PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS:

Overall, 47 reviews were eligible for inclusion. Out of the nine COVID-19 outcomes evaluated, there was significant associations between ACEIs/ARBs use and each of death (OR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.75-0.86; I2  = 51.9%), death/ICU admission as composite outcome (OR = 0.86, 95%CI = 0.80-0.92; I2  = 43.9%), severe COVID-19 (OR = 0.86, 95%CI = 0.78-0.95; I2  = 68%) and hospitalisation (OR = 1.23, 95%CI = 1.04-1.46; I2  = 76.4%). The significant reduction in death/ICU admission, however, was higher among studies which presented adjusted measure of effects (OR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.47-0.84) and were of moderate quality (OR = 0.74, 95%CI = 0.63-0.85).

CONCLUSIONS:

Collective evidence from observational studies indicate a good quality evidence on the significant association between ACEIs/ARBs use and reduction in death and death/ICU admission, but poor-quality evidence on both reducing severe COVID-19 and increasing hospitalisation. Our findings further support the current recommendations of not discontinuing ACEIs/ARBs therapy in patients with COVID-19.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: COVID-19 / Hipertensão Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Clin Invest Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: COVID-19 / Hipertensão Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Clin Invest Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido