Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Postoperative analysis of osseous midface reconstructions: The value of imaging and a novel scoring system for complexity and operative success.
Swendseid, Brian; Philips, Ramez H W; Carey, Ryan M; Cannady, Steven B; Sweeny, Larissa; Wax, Mark K; Luginbuhl, Adam J; Curry, Joseph M.
Afiliação
  • Swendseid B; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Philips RHW; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Cooper University Health, Camden, New Jersey, USA.
  • Carey RM; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Cannady SB; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Sweeny L; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Wax MK; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
  • Luginbuhl AJ; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Curry JM; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Head Neck ; 45(1): 237-242, 2023 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36300998
BACKGROUND: Few standardized methods exist for evaluating the postoperative outcomes of osteocutaneous free flaps. We propose an anatomic-based scoring system for midface free flap reconstruction. METHODS: One hundred and twelve patients across four institutions underwent osteocutaneous reconstruction of the midface. Postoperative scans were scored based on the number of independent osseous subunits reconstructed (Subunit Score), the number of different bony appositions with bony contact (Contact Score), and the number of osseous segments in anatomic position (Position Score). These were added together to create a Total Score. RESULTS: Osteocutaneous radial forearm flaps had the lowest Subunit Score (p = 0.001). Fibula flaps had the highest Contact Score (p = 0.0008) and Position Score (p = 0.001). Virtual surgical planning was associated with an increased Subunit Score (p = 0.02) and Total Score (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We propose a novel scoring system for osseous midface reconstruction based on postoperative imaging scans. This can help guide management decisions and create a common language to compare outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Retalhos de Tecido Biológico Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Head Neck Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Retalhos de Tecido Biológico Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Head Neck Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos