Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predictive value of a serum tumor biomarkers scoring system for clinical stage II/III rectal cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Zhao, Jie-Yi; Tang, Qing-Qing; Luo, Yu-Ting; Wang, Shu-Min; Zhu, Xiao-Rui; Wang, Xiao-Yu.
Afiliação
  • Zhao JY; Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
  • Tang QQ; Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
  • Luo YT; West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
  • Wang SM; West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
  • Zhu XR; West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
  • Wang XY; Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China. yuxixi1052006@126.com.
World J Gastrointest Oncol ; 14(10): 2014-2024, 2022 Oct 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36310703
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Multiple classes of molecular biomarkers have been studied as potential predictors for rectal cancer (RC) response. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is the most widely used blood-based marker of RC and has proven to be an effective predictive marker. Cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is another tumor biomarker used for RC diagnosis and postoperative monitoring, as well as monitoring of the therapeutic effect. Using a panel of tumor markers for RC outcome prediction is a practical approach.

AIM:

To assess the predictive effect of pre-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) CEA and CA19-9 levels on the prognosis of stage II/III RC patients.

METHODS:

CEA and CA19-9 levels were evaluated 1 wk before NCRT. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal cut-off point of CEA and CA19-9 levels for the prognosis were 3.55 and 19.01, respectively. The novel serum tumor biomarker (NSTB) scores were as follows score 0 Pre-NCRT CEA < 3.55 and CA19-9 < 19.01; score 2 Pre-NCRT CEA > 3.55 and CA19-9 > 19.01; score 1 Other situations. Pathological information was recorded according to histopathological reports after the operation.

RESULTS:

In the univariate analysis, pre-NCRT CEA < 3.55 [P = 0.025 for overall survival (OS), P = 0.019 for disease-free survival (DFS)], pre-NCRT CA19-9 < 19.01 (P = 0.014 for OS, P = 0.009 for DFS), a lower NSTB score (0-1 vs 2, P = 0.009 for OS, P = 0.005 for DFS) could predict a better prognosis. However, in the multivariate analysis, only a lower NSTB score (0-1 vs 2; for OS, HR = 0.485, 95%CI 0.251-0.940, P = 0.032; for DFS, HR = 0.453, 95%CI 0.234-0.877, P = 0.019) and higher pathological grade, node and metastasis stage (0-I vs II-III; for OS, HR = 0.363, 95%CI 0.158-0.837, P = 0.017; for DFS, HR = 0.342, 95%CI 0.149-0.786, P = 0.012) were independent predictive factors.

CONCLUSION:

The combination of post-NCRT CEA and CA19-9 was a predictive factor for clinical stage II/III RC patients receiving NCRT, and the combined index had a stronger predictive effect.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: World J Gastrointest Oncol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: World J Gastrointest Oncol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China