Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Robotic eTEP versus IPOM evaluation: the REVEAL multicenter randomized clinical trial.
Petro, Clayton C; Montelione, Katherine C; Zolin, Samuel J; Renton, David B; Yunis, Jonathan P; Meara, Michael P; Costanzo, Adele; Diaz, Kayla; McKenzie, Kristen; Wilber, Melanie; Fonseca, Tamela; Tu, Chao; Olson, Molly A; Krpata, David M; Beffa, Lucas R; Poulose, Ben K; Rosen, Michael J; Prabhu, Ajita S.
Afiliação
  • Petro CC; Department of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave. A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. PETROC@ccf.org.
  • Montelione KC; Department of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave. A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Zolin SJ; Department of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave. A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Renton DB; Department of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Yunis JP; Center for Hernia Repair, Sarasota Memorial Hospital, Sarasota, FL, USA.
  • Meara MP; Department of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Costanzo A; Department of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave. A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Diaz K; Department of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • McKenzie K; Center for Hernia Repair, Sarasota Memorial Hospital, Sarasota, FL, USA.
  • Wilber M; Center for Hernia Repair, Sarasota Memorial Hospital, Sarasota, FL, USA.
  • Fonseca T; Center for Hernia Repair, Sarasota Memorial Hospital, Sarasota, FL, USA.
  • Tu C; Department of Statistics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Olson MA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Krpata DM; Department of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave. A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Beffa LR; Department of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave. A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Poulose BK; Department of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Rosen MJ; Department of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave. A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Prabhu AS; Department of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave. A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Surg Endosc ; 37(3): 2143-2153, 2023 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36323978
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

For small to medium-sized ventral hernias, robotic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (rIPOM) and enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) repair have emerged as acceptable approaches that each takes advantage of robotic instrumentation. We hypothesized that avoiding mesh fixation in a robotic eTEP repair offers an advantage in early postoperative pain compared to rIPOM.

METHODS:

This is a multi-center, randomized clinical trial for patients with midline ventral hernias ≤ 7 cm, who were randomized to rIPOM or robotic eTEP. The primary outcome was pain (0-10) on the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included same-day discharge, length of stay, opioid consumption, quality of life, surgeon workload, and cost.

RESULTS:

Between November 2019 and November 2021, 100 patients were randomized (49 rIPOM, 51 eTEP) among 5 surgeons. Pain on the first postoperative day [median (IQR) 5 (4-6) vs. 5 (3.5-7), p = 0.66] was similar for rIPOM and eTEP, respectively, a difference maintained following adjustments for surgeon, operative time, baseline pain, and patient co-morbidities (difference 0.28, 95% CI - 0.63 to 1.19, p = 0.56). No differences in pain on the day of surgery, 7, and 30 days after surgery were identified. Same-day discharge, length of stay, opioid consumption, and 30-day quality of life were also comparable, though rIPOM required less surgeon workload (p < 0.001), shorter operative time [107 (86-139) vs. 165 (129-212) min, p < 0.001], and resulted in fewer surgical site occurrences (0 vs. 8, p = 0.004). The total direct costs for rIPOM and eTEP were comparable [$8282 (6979-11835) vs. $8680 (7550-10282), p = 0.52] as the cost savings for eTEP attributable to mesh use [$442 (434-485) vs. $69 (62-76), p = < 0.0001] were offset by increased expenses for operative time [$669 (579-861) vs. $1075 (787-1367), p < 0.0001] and use of more robotic equipment [$760 (615-933) vs. $946 (798-1203), p = 0.001].

CONCLUSION:

The avoidance of fixation in a robotic eTEP repair did not reveal a benefit in postoperative pain to offset the shorter operative time and surgeon workload offered by rIPOM.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Laparoscopia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Hérnia Incisional / Hérnia Ventral Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Laparoscopia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Hérnia Incisional / Hérnia Ventral Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos