Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound elastography for differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A propensity score-matched analysis.
Cho, In Rae; Jeong, Seok-Hoo; Kang, Huapyong; Kim, Eui Joo; Kim, Yeon Suk; Jeon, Soyoung; Cho, Jae Hee.
Afiliação
  • Cho IR; Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Jeong SH; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
  • Kang H; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim EJ; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim YS; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
  • Jeon S; Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Cho JH; Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: jhcho9328@gmail.com.
Pancreatology ; 23(1): 105-111, 2023 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36509644
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Endoscopic ultrasound-elastography (EUS-EG) is a non-invasive complementary diagnostic method for differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions (SPL). However, the optimal strain ratio (SR) value and diagnostic performance of EUS-EG have not yet been determined in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PNEN), mass-forming pancreatitis (MFP), and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We aimed to determine the optimal SR value in EUS-EG for differential diagnosis of SPLs.

METHODS:

Patients who underwent EUS-EG for SPL evaluation between July 2016 and June 2019 were retrospectively investigated. Patients were divided into three groups based on the final diagnosis (PNEN, MFP, or PDAC). Patient demographics, characteristics of SPL, and EUS-EG were compared.

RESULTS:

The mean (± standard deviation) SR value for each group were 11.85 ± 7.56 (PNEN, n = 10), 11.45 ± 5.97 (MFP, n = 37), and 22.50 ± 13.19 (PDAC, n = 87). Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that an increase of SR value was significantly associated with PDAC (PNEN versus PDAC, p = 0.0216; MFP versus PDAC, p = 0.0006). The optimal cut-off value for differential diagnosis was confirmed as 17.14 after propensity score matching.

CONCLUSIONS:

We provided the optimal cut-off SR values for differential diagnosis between MFP and PDAC. EUS-EG can be used as a supplementary diagnostic method in the diagnosis of SPLs. (Clinical trial registration number https//cris.nih.go.kr/cris KCT0002082).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Pancreatite / Tumores Neuroendócrinos / Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático / Técnicas de Imagem por Elasticidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pancreatology Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Pancreatite / Tumores Neuroendócrinos / Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático / Técnicas de Imagem por Elasticidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pancreatology Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article