Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pembrolizumab versus cetuximab concurrent with radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck unfit for cisplatin (GORTEC 2015-01 PembroRad): a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial.
Tao, Y; Biau, J; Sun, X S; Sire, C; Martin, L; Alfonsi, M; Prevost, J B; Modesto, A; Lafond, C; Tourani, J M; Miroir, J; Kaminsky, M C; Coutte, A; Liem, X; Chautard, E; Vauleon, E; Drouet, F; Ruffier, A; Ramee, J F; Waksi, G; Péchery, A; Wanneveich, M; Guigay, J; Aupérin, A; Bourhis, J.
Afiliação
  • Tao Y; Gustave-Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France.
  • Biau J; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France.
  • Sun XS; Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, Montbéliard and CHU Besançon, Montbéliard, France.
  • Sire C; Centre Hospitalier de Bretagne Sud, Lorient, France.
  • Martin L; Clinique des Ormeaux, Le Havre, France.
  • Alfonsi M; Clinique Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France.
  • Prevost JB; Centre Pierre Curie, Beuvry, France.
  • Modesto A; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France.
  • Lafond C; Clinique Victor Hugo-Centre Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France.
  • Tourani JM; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
  • Miroir J; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France.
  • Kaminsky MC; Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
  • Coutte A; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France.
  • Liem X; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
  • Chautard E; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France.
  • Vauleon E; Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.
  • Drouet F; Clinique Mutualiste de l'estuaire, Saint-Nazaire, France.
  • Ruffier A; Gustave-Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France; Clinique Victor Hugo-Centre Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France.
  • Ramee JF; Centre Hospitalier Départemental de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France.
  • Waksi G; GORTEC, Tours, France.
  • Péchery A; GORTEC, Tours, France.
  • Wanneveich M; GORTEC, Tours, France.
  • Guigay J; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, FHU OncoAge, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
  • Aupérin A; Unit of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat 1018 INSERM, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
  • Bourhis J; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: jean.bourhis@chuv.ch.
Ann Oncol ; 34(1): 101-110, 2023 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36522816
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To evaluate potential synergistic effect of pembrolizumab with radiotherapy (RT) compared with a standard-of-care (SOC) cetuximab-RT in patients with locally advanced-squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (LA-SCCHN). PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Patients with nonoperated stage III-IV SCC of oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx and unfit for receiving high-dose cisplatin were enrolled. Patients received once-daily RT up to 69.96 Gy in 33 fractions with weekly cetuximab (cetuximab-RT arm) or 200 mg Q3W pembrolizumab during RT (pembrolizumab-RT arm). The primary endpoint was locoregional control (LRC) rate 15 months after RT. To detect a difference between arms of 60%-80% in 15-month LRC, inclusion of 66 patients per arm was required to achieve a power of at least 0.85 at two-sided significance level of 0.20.

RESULTS:

Between May 2016 and October 2017, 133 patients were randomized to cetuximab-RT (n = 66) and pembrolizumab-RT (n = 67). Two patients (one in each arm) were not included in the analysis (a consent withdrawal and a progression before treatment start). The median age was 65 years (interquartile range 60-70 years), 92% were smokers, 60% were oropharynx (46% of oropharynx with p16+) and 75% were stage IV. Median follow-up was 25 months in both arms. The 15-month LRC rate was 59% with cetuximab-RT and 60% with pembrolizumab-RT ]odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-2.59; P = 0.91]. There was no significant difference between arms for progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.55-1.32; P = 0.47) and for overall survival (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.49-1.40; P = 0.49). Toxicity was lower in the pembrolizumab-RT arm than in the cetuximab-RT arm 74% versus 92% patients with at least one grade ≥3 adverse events (P = 0.006), mainly due to mucositis, radiodermatitis, and rash.

CONCLUSION:

Compared with the SOC cetuximab-RT, pembrolizumab concomitant with RT did not improve the tumor control and survival but appeared less toxic in unfit patients with LA-SCCHN.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Quimiorradioterapia / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Quimiorradioterapia / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França