Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stakeholder perspectives on current determinants of ultrasound-guided thoracentesis in resource limited settings: a qualitative study.
Doran, Jennifer; Hanna, Reem; Nyagura-Mangori, Tatenda; Mahotra, Narayan; Das, Santa Kumar; Borok, Magaret; Musani, Ali; Maw, Anna M.
Afiliação
  • Doran J; Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado, USA jennifer.doran@cuanschutz.edu.
  • Hanna R; Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Nyagura-Mangori T; Department of Medicine, Harare University Teaching Hospital, Harare, Zimbabwe.
  • Mahotra N; Division of Physiology, Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine, Maharajgunj, Nepal.
  • Das SK; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Borok M; Unit of Internal Medicine, University of Zimbabwe Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Harare, Zimbabwe.
  • Musani A; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Maw AM; Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
BMJ Open ; 12(12): e064638, 2022 12 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36523247
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Preprocedure pleural fluid localization using bedside ultrasound has been shown to reduce complications related to thoracentesis and is now considered the standard of care. However, ultrasound-guided thoracentesis (USGT) has not been broadly adopted in many low-resource settings. With increasing affordability and portability of ultrasound equipment, barriers to USGT are changing. The aim of this multisite qualitative study is to understand the current barriers to USGT in two resource-limited settings.

SETTING:

We studied two geographically diverse settings, Harare, Zimbabwe, and Kathmandu, Nepal.

PARTICIPANTS:

19 multilevel stakeholders including clinical trainees, attendings, clinical educators and hospital administrators were interviewed. There were no exclusion criteria. PRIMARY

OUTCOME:

To understand the current determinants of USGT adoption in these settings.

RESULTS:

Three main themes emerged from these interviews (1) stakeholders perceived multiple advantages of USGT, (2) access to equipment and training were perceived as limited and (3) while an online training approach is feasible, stakeholders expressed scepticism that this was an appropriate modality for procedural training.

CONCLUSION:

Our data suggests that USGT implementation is desired by local stakeholders and that the development of an educational intervention, cocreated with local stakeholders, should be explored to ensure optimal contextual fit.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ultrassonografia de Intervenção / Toracentese Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ultrassonografia de Intervenção / Toracentese Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos