Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Breast Reconstruction: Economic Impact Swiss Health Insurance System.
Martin, Jeanne; di Summa, Pietro G; Raffoul, Wassim; Koch, Nathalie.
Afiliação
  • Martin J; Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetics Surgery Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • di Summa PG; Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetics Surgery Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Raffoul W; Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetics Surgery Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Koch N; Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetics Surgery Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Medicines (Basel) ; 9(12)2022 Dec 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36547997
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Considering present concerns about healthcare costs and the lack of evidence and published articles on breast reconstruction costs in Switzerland, we retrospectively investigated charges to the Swiss healthcare system for different breast reconstruction procedures at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois.

METHODS:

We selected all hospitalized patients at the University Hospital who underwent a "total" delayed breast reconstruction from January 2012 to December 2015. Analysis included 72 women who underwent autologous or implant-based reconstructions. Three main breast reconstruction techniques were included Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (n = 46) autologous flap reconstruction, Tissue Expander followed by Implant (n = 12) and pedicled Latissimus Dorsi (n = 12) flap with or without tissue expander and implant (n = 7). For all different groups, the global costs of reconstruction and total number of required operations were statistically compared.

RESULTS:

Global costs for Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator reconstruction were 29,728 ± 1892 CHF (avg ± Std. Error of Mean), while Tissue Expander reconstruction showed a significantly higher global cost, reaching an average of 44,313 ± 5553 CHF (avg ± Std. Error of Mean). LD showed a similar cost, compared to the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator reconstruction (29,813 ± 3637 CHF), increasing when including an implant (37,688 ± 4840 CHF). No significant differences in the number of interventions were detected.

CONCLUSION:

These data show that autologous breast reconstruction (DIEP) delivers the best cost ratio, with lower overall costs. Implant-based reconstructions showed a greater likelihood of complications and re-intervention, globally creating superior costs when compared to autologous reconstructions.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Idioma: En Revista: Medicines (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Idioma: En Revista: Medicines (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça