Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do conspiracy theorists think too much or too little?
Brashier, Nadia M.
Afiliação
  • Brashier NM; Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, 703 Third St, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. Electronic address: brashier@purdue.edu.
Curr Opin Psychol ; 49: 101504, 2023 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36577227
ABSTRACT
Conspiracy theories explain distressing events as malevolent actions by powerful groups. Why do people believe in secret plots when other explanations are more probable? On the one hand, conspiracy theorists seem to disregard accuracy; they tend to endorse mutually incompatible conspiracies, think intuitively, use heuristics, and hold other irrational beliefs. But by definition, conspiracy theorists reject the mainstream explanation for an event, often in favor of a more complex account. They exhibit a general distrust of others and expend considerable effort to find 'evidence' supporting their beliefs. In searching for answers, conspiracy theorists likely expose themselves to misleading information online and overestimate their own knowledge. Understanding when elaboration and cognitive effort might backfire is crucial, as conspiracy beliefs lead to political disengagement, environmental inaction, prejudice, and support for violence.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Curr Opin Psychol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Curr Opin Psychol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article