Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of core laboratory assessment on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes using combined fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve measurements - DEFINE-FLOW core laboratory sub-study.
van de Hoef, Tim P; Stegehuis, Valérie E; Madera-Cambero, Maribel I; van Royen, Niels; van der Hoeven, Nina W; de Waard, Guus A; Meuwissen, Martijn; Christiansen, Evald H; Eftekhari, Ashkan; Niccoli, Giampaolo; Lockie, Tim; Matsuo, Hitoshi; Nakayama, Masafumi; Kakuta, Tsunekazu; Tanaka, Nobuhiro; Casadonte, Lorena; Spaan, Jos A E; Siebes, Maria; Tijssen, Jan G P; Escaned, Javier; Piek, Jan J.
Afiliação
  • van de Hoef TP; Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC - location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Stegehuis VE; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC - location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Madera-Cambero MI; Department of Cardiology, Tergooi Hospital, Blaricum, Netherlands.
  • van Royen N; Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • van der Hoeven NW; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC - location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • de Waard GA; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC - location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Meuwissen M; Department of Cardiology, Amphia Ziekenhuis, Breda, the Netherlands.
  • Christiansen EH; Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
  • Eftekhari A; Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
  • Niccoli G; University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
  • Lockie T; Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
  • Matsuo H; Cardiovascular Division, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, Japan.
  • Nakayama M; Cardiovascular Division, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, Japan; Cardiovascular Center, Todachuo General Hospital, Toda, Japan.
  • Kakuta T; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Japan.
  • Tanaka N; Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Medical University, Hachioji Medical Center, Japan.
  • Casadonte L; Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC - location AMC, the Netherlands.
  • Spaan JAE; Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC - location AMC, the Netherlands.
  • Siebes M; Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC - location AMC, the Netherlands.
  • Tijssen JGP; Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Escaned J; Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • Piek JJ; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC - location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.j.piek@amsterdamumc.nl.
Int J Cardiol ; 377: 9-16, 2023 04 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36640965
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The role of combined FFR/CFR measurements in decision-making on coronary revascularization remains unclear. DEFINE-FLOW prospectively assessed the relationship of FFR/CFR agreement with 2-year major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and target vessel failure (TVF) rates, and uniquely included core-laboratory analysis of all pressure and flow tracings. We aimed to document the impact of core-laboratory analysis on lesion classification, and the relationship between core-laboratory fractional flow reserve (FFR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) values with clinical outcomes and angina burden during follow-up.

METHODS:

In 398 vessels (348 patients) considered for intervention, ≥1 coronary pressure/flow tracing was approved by the core-laboratory. Revascularization was performed only when both FFR(≤0.80) and CFR(<2.0) were abnormal, all others were treated medically.

RESULTS:

MACE was lowest for concordant normal FFR/CFR, but was not significantly different compared with either discordant group (low FFR/normal CFR HR1.63; 95%CI0.61-4.40; P = 0.33; normal FFR/low CFR HR1.81; 95%CI0.66-4.98; P = 0.25). Moreover, MACE did not differ between discordant groups treated medically and the concordant abnormal group undergoing revascularization (normal FFR/low CFR HR0.63; 95%CI0.23-1.73;P = 0.37; normal FFR/low CFR HR0.70; 95%CI0.22-2.21;P = 0.54). Similar findings applied to TVF.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with concordantly normal FFR/CFR have very low 2-year MACE and TVF rates. Throughout follow-up, there were no differences in event rates between patients in whom revascularization was deferred due to preserved CFR despite reduced FFR, and those in whom PCI was performed due to concordantly low FFR and CFR. These findings question the need for routine revascularization in vessels showing low FFR but preserved CFR. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION http//ClinicalTrials.govNCT02328820.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Estenose Coronária / Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico / Intervenção Coronária Percutânea Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Estenose Coronária / Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico / Intervenção Coronária Percutânea Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda