Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of bone-implant gap size on the interfacial osseointegration: an in vivo study.
Huang, Kangkang; Wu, Tingkui; Lou, Jigang; Wang, Beiyu; Ding, Chen; Gong, Quan; Rong, Xin; Liu, Hao.
Afiliação
  • Huang K; Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37# Guoxue Lane, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, China.
  • Wu T; Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37# Guoxue Lane, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, China.
  • Lou J; Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou Henan, 450052, China.
  • Wang B; Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37# Guoxue Lane, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, China.
  • Ding C; Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37# Guoxue Lane, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, China.
  • Gong Q; Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37# Guoxue Lane, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, China.
  • Rong X; Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37# Guoxue Lane, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, China. rongxin@scu.edu.cn.
  • Liu H; Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37# Guoxue Lane, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, China. dr.liuhao6304@hotmail.com.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 24(1): 115, 2023 Feb 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36765314
BACKGROUND: The bone-implant gap resulted from morphological mismatch between cervical bony endplates and implant footprint may have adverse impact on bone-implant interfacial osseointegration of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of bone-implant gap size on the interfacial osseointegration in a rabbit animal model. METHODS: A series of round-plate implants with different teeth depth (0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm and 2.0 mm) was specifically designed. A total of 48 New Zealand white rabbits were randomly categorized into four groups by the implants they received (0.5 mm: group A, 1.0 mm: group B, 1.5 mm: group C, 2.0 mm: group D). At 4th and 12th week after surgery, animals were sacrificed. Micro-CT, acid fuchsin and methylene blue staining and hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining were conducted. RESULTS: At 4th week and 12th week after surgery, both micro-CT and HE staining showed more new bone formation and larger bone coverage in group A and group B than that in group C and group D. At 12th week, the bone biometric parameters were significantly superior in group C when compared with group D (p < 0.05). At 12th week, hard tissue slicing demonstrated larger portion of direct contact of new bone to the HA coating in group A and group B. CONCLUSIONS: Bone-implant gap size larger than 1.0 mm negatively affected bone-implant osseointegration between compact bone and HA coated implant surface.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Titânio / Osseointegração Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Assunto da revista: FISIOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Titânio / Osseointegração Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Assunto da revista: FISIOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China