Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Who publishes imaging articles in non-imaging journals? A large sample data-mining study.
Gaudemer, Augustin; Haegel, Adrien; Dioguardi Burgio, Marco; Vilgrain, Valérie; Grégory, Jules; Ronot, Maxime.
Afiliação
  • Gaudemer A; Centre de Recherche de L'Inflammation (CRI), Université Paris Cité, INSERM U1149, Paris, France.
  • Haegel A; Department of Radiology, APHP.Nord, Hôpital Beaujon, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France.
  • Dioguardi Burgio M; Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France.
  • Vilgrain V; Centre de Recherche de L'Inflammation (CRI), Université Paris Cité, INSERM U1149, Paris, France.
  • Grégory J; Centre de Recherche de L'Inflammation (CRI), Université Paris Cité, INSERM U1149, Paris, France.
  • Ronot M; Centre de Recherche de L'Inflammation (CRI), Université Paris Cité, INSERM U1149, Paris, France.
Eur Radiol ; 33(8): 5653-5663, 2023 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36820924
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the weight of imaging and imaging specialists (i.e., affiliated to a radiology/nuclear medicine department) in publications in non-imaging journals.

METHODS:

All articles indexed in English on the Embase database between 1989 and 2019 were extracted. The number and affiliation of authors were determined. A naive Bayesian classifier algorithm was trained to classify abstracts as "imaging" or "non-imaging." The main outcome was the number and position of imaging specialists in the authorship of imaging articles published in non-imaging journals. Analyses per medical specialties and per journal impact factor (IF) were performed.

RESULTS:

A total of 15,787,825 articles were included with 968,259 (6%) "imaging" articles. The proportion of imaging articles increased over time (+ 370%), quicker than the overall academic output. The proportion of imaging specialist among authors grew from 0.58% in 1989-1994 to 1.54% in 2015-2019. About 20% of imaging articles had ≥ 1 imaging specialist among authors. The proportion of imaging articles decreased with the IF (7.3% for IF 0-2.5 vs. 5.1% for IF > 10, p < 0.001), but the proportion of imaging specialist authors in imaging papers with ≥ 1 imaging specialist author increased with the IF (40% for IF 0-2.5, 53% for IF > 10, p < 0.001). There was significant variability across medical specialties.

CONCLUSIONS:

The weight of imaging articles and imaging specialist among authors in non-imaging journals has increased over time but remains limited. Most of the authors of imaging publications are not imaging specialists. Imaging specialists among authors in imaging papers are associated with a greater IF. KEY POINTS • The proportion of imaging specialist authors in non-imaging journals, though small, has increased significantly. • Marked differences are observed according to medical specialties and the reputation/impact factor of the journal. • Collaboration between imaging specialists and non-specialists is associated with publication in higher impact journals.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Publicações Periódicas como Assunto / Medicina Nuclear Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Publicações Periódicas como Assunto / Medicina Nuclear Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França