Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Artificial Intelligence Modeling to Predict Periprosthetic Infection and Explantation following Implant-Based Reconstruction.
Hassan, Abbas M; Biaggi-Ondina, Andrea; Asaad, Malke; Morris, Natalie; Liu, Jun; Selber, Jesse C; Butler, Charles E.
Afiliação
  • Hassan AM; From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
  • Biaggi-Ondina A; From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
  • Asaad M; From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
  • Morris N; From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
  • Liu J; From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
  • Selber JC; From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
  • Butler CE; From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 152(5): 929-938, 2023 11 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36862958
BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in prosthesis design and surgical techniques, periprosthetic infection and explantation rates following implant-based reconstruction (IBR) remain relatively high. Artificial intelligence is an extremely powerful predictive tool that involves machine learning (ML) algorithms. We sought to develop, validate, and evaluate the use of ML algorithms to predict complications of IBR. METHODS: A comprehensive review of patients who underwent IBR from January of 2018 to December of 2019 was conducted. Nine supervised ML algorithms were developed to predict periprosthetic infection and explantation. Patient data were randomly divided into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets. RESULTS: The authors identified 481 patients (694 reconstructions) with a mean ± SD age of 50.0 ± 11.5 years, mean ± SD body mass index of 26.7 ± 4.8 kg/m 2 , and median follow-up time of 16.1 months (range, 11.9 to 3.2 months). Periprosthetic infection developed in 113 of the reconstructions (16.3%), and explantation was required with 82 (11.8%) of them. ML demonstrated good discriminatory performance in predicting periprosthetic infection and explantation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.73 and 0.78, respectively), and identified nine and 12 significant predictors of periprosthetic infection and explantation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ML algorithms trained using readily available perioperative clinical data accurately predict periprosthetic infection and explantation following IBR. The authors' findings support incorporating ML models into perioperative assessment of patients undergoing IBR to provide data-driven, patient-specific risk assessment to aid individualized patient counseling, shared decision-making, and presurgical optimization.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes de Mama / Implante Mamário Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes de Mama / Implante Mamário Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article