Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differences in Outflow Facility Between Angiographically Identified High- Versus Low-Flow Regions of the Conventional Outflow Pathways in Porcine Eyes.
Strohmaier, Clemens A; McDonnell, Fiona S; Zhang, Xiaowei; Wanderer, Daniel; Stamer, W Daniel; Weinreb, Robert N; Huang, Alex S.
Afiliação
  • Strohmaier CA; Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
  • McDonnell FS; Hamilton Glaucoma Center, The Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, California, United States.
  • Zhang X; Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
  • Wanderer D; Hamilton Glaucoma Center, The Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, California, United States.
  • Stamer WD; Hamilton Glaucoma Center, The Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, California, United States.
  • Weinreb RN; Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
  • Huang AS; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; 64(3): 29, 2023 03 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36939719
Purpose: To investigate differences in outflow facility between angiographically determined high- and low-flow segments of the conventional outflow pathway in porcine eyes. Methods: Porcine anterior segments (n = 14) were mounted in a perfusion chamber and perfused using Dulbecco's phosphate buffered solution with glucose. Fluorescein angiography was performed to determine high- and low-flow regions of the conventional outflow pathways. The trabecular meshwork (TM) was occluded using cyanoacrylate glue, except for residual 5-mm TM areas that were either high or low flow at baseline, designating these eyes as "residual high-flow" or "residual low-flow" eyes. Subsequently, outflow was quantitatively reassessed and compared between residual high-flow and residual low-flow eyes followed by indocyanine green angiography. Results: Fluorescein aqueous angiography demonstrated high-flow and low-flow regions. Baseline outflow facilities were 0.320 ± 0.08 and 0.328 ± 0.10 µL/min/mmHg (P = 0.676) in residual high-flow and residual low-flow eyes before TM occlusion, respectively. After partial trabecular meshwork occlusion, outflow facility decreased to 0.209 ± 0.07 µL/min/mmHg (-32.66% ± 19.53%) and 0.114 ± 0.08 µL/min/mmHg (-66.57% ± 23.08%) in residual high- and low-flow eyes (P = 0.035), respectively. There was a significant difference in the resulting IOP increase (P = 0.034). Conclusions: Angiographically determined high- and low-flow regions in the conventional outflow pathways differ in their segmental outflow facility; thus, there is an uneven distribution of local outflow facility across different parts of the TM.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Humor Aquoso / Olho / Pressão Intraocular Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Áustria

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Humor Aquoso / Olho / Pressão Intraocular Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Áustria