Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Machine learning models in predicting graft survival in kidney transplantation: meta-analysis.
Ravindhran, Bharadhwaj; Chandak, Pankaj; Schafer, Nicole; Kundalia, Kaushal; Hwang, Woochan; Antoniadis, Savvas; Haroon, Usman; Zakri, Rhana Hassan.
Afiliação
  • Ravindhran B; Department of Renal Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Chandak P; Department of Renal Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Schafer N; Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Kundalia K; Department of Renal Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Hwang W; Department of Renal Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Antoniadis S; Department of Renal Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Haroon U; Department of Renal Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Zakri RH; Department of Renal Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
BJS Open ; 7(2)2023 03 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36987687
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The variations in outcome and frequent occurrence of kidney allograft failure continue to pose important clinical and research challenges despite recent advances in kidney transplantation. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the current application of machine learning models in kidney transplantation and perform a meta-analysis of these models in the prediction of graft survival.

METHODS:

This review was registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42021247469) and all peer-reviewed original articles that reported machine learning model-based prediction of graft survival were included. Quality assessment was performed by the criteria defined by Qiao and risk-of-bias assessment was performed using the PROBAST tool. The diagnostic performance of the meta-analysis was assessed by a meta-analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic plot.

RESULTS:

A total of 31 studies met the inclusion criteria for the review and 27 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Twenty-nine different machine learning models were used to predict graft survival in the included studies. Nine studies compared the predictive performance of machine learning models with traditional regression methods. Five studies had a high risk of bias and three studies had an unclear risk of bias. The area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82 and the summary sensitivity and specificity of machine learning-based models were 0.81 (95 per cent c.i. 0.76 to 0.86) and 0.81 (95 per cent c.i. 0.74 to 0.86) respectively for the overall model. The diagnostic odds ratio for the overall model was 18.24 (95 per cent c.i. 11.00 to 30.16) and 29.27 (95 per cent c.i. 13.22 to 44.46) based on the sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION:

Prediction models using machine learning methods may improve the prediction of outcomes after kidney transplantation by the integration of the vast amounts of non-linear data.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim / Insuficiência Renal Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BJS Open Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim / Insuficiência Renal Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BJS Open Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido