Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring the impact of the reclassification of a hereditary cancer syndrome gene variant: emerging themes from a qualitative study.
Wedd, Laura; Gleeson, Margaret; Meiser, Bettina; O'Shea, Rosie; Barlow-Stewart, Kristine; Spurdle, Amanda B; James, Paul; Fleming, Jane; Nichols, Cassandra; Austin, Rachel; Cops, Elisa; Monnik, Melissa; Do, Judy; Kaur, Rajneesh.
Afiliação
  • Wedd L; School of Clinical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Gleeson M; Centre for Population Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research Sydney, Darlinghurst, Australia.
  • Meiser B; Hunter Family Cancer Service, Newcastle, Australia.
  • O'Shea R; School of Clinical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia. b.meiser@unsw.edu.au.
  • Barlow-Stewart K; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Spurdle AB; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • James P; Molecular Cancer Epidemiology Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Fleming J; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Nichols C; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Austin R; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Cops E; Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Australia.
  • Monnik M; Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Do J; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Kaur R; Adult Genetics Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
J Community Genet ; 14(3): 307-317, 2023 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37012465
The complexity of genetic variant interpretation means that a proportion of individuals who undergo genetic testing for a hereditary cancer syndrome will have their test result reclassified over time. Such a reclassification may involve a clinically significant upgrade or downgrade in pathogenicity, which may have significant implications for medical management. To date, few studies have examined the psychosocial impact of a reclassification in a hereditary cancer syndrome context. To address this gap, semi-structured telephone interviews were performed with eighteen individuals who had a BRCA1, BRCA2 or Lynch syndrome-related (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2) gene variant reclassified. The interviews were analysed utilising an inductive, qualitative approach and emergent themes were identified by thematic analysis. Variable levels of recall amongst participants were found. Common motivations for initial testing included a significant personal and/or family history of cancer and a desire to "find an answer". No individual whose uncertain result was upgraded reported negative psychosocial outcomes; most reported adapting to their reclassified result and appraised their genetic testing experience positively. However, individuals whose likely pathogenic/pathogenic results were downgraded reported feelings of anger, shock and sadness post reclassification, highlighting that additional psychosocial support may be required for some. Genetic counselling issues and recommendations for clinical practice are outlined.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: J Community Genet Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: J Community Genet Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália