Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Pharmacological Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Latin America.
Taborda Restrepo, Paula Andrea; Acosta-Reyes, Jorge; Estupiñan-Bohorquez, Andrés; Barrios-Mercado, María Alejandra; Correa Gonzalez, Nestor Fabián; Taborda Restrepo, Alejandra; Barengo, Noël C; Gabriel, Rafael.
Afiliação
  • Taborda Restrepo PA; Sapyens SAS BIC, Bogotá, Colombia. epidemiologia@saludsapyens.com.
  • Acosta-Reyes J; Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.
  • Estupiñan-Bohorquez A; Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.
  • Barrios-Mercado MA; Sapyens SAS BIC, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Correa Gonzalez NF; Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.
  • Taborda Restrepo A; Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Barengo NC; Sapyens SAS BIC, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Gabriel R; Department of Translational Medicine, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine and Department of Health Policy and Management, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Curr Diab Rep ; 23(6): 89-101, 2023 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37126189
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the leading causes of death and disability in the world. The majority of diabetes deaths (> 80%) occur in low- and middle-income countries, which are predominant in Latin America. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to compare the clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the pharmacological management of T2DM in Latin America (LA) with international reference guidelines. RECENT

FINDINGS:

Several LA countries have recently developed CPGs. However, the quality of these guidelines is unknown according to the AGREE II tool and taking as reference three CPGs of international impact American Diabetes Association (ADA), European Diabetes Association (EASD), and Latin American Diabetes Association (ALAD). Ten CPGs were selected for analysis. The ADA scored > 80% on the AGREE II domains and was selected as the main comparator. Eighty percent of LA CPGs were developed before 2018. Only one was not recommended (all domains < 60%). The CPGs in LA have good quality but are outdated. They have significant gaps compared to the reference. There is a need for improvement, as proposing updates every three years to maintain the best available clinical evidence in all guidelines.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Curr Diab Rep Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Colômbia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Curr Diab Rep Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Colômbia