Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Liu, Wentao; Gong, Jian; Gu, Li.
Afiliação
  • Liu W; Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, Changsha, 410011, People's Republic of China.
  • Gong J; Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, Changsha, 410011, People's Republic of China.
  • Gu L; Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, Changsha, 410011, People's Republic of China. ligu0423@csu.edu.cn.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 38(1): 136, 2023 May 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37204495
PURPOSE: The optimal technique for removing small colorectal polyps ranging from 5 to 10 mm in size remains uncertain. In order to compare the efficacy and adverse events between cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for removing small polyps, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases from 1998 to May 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for resecting small colorectal polyps. The primary outcome measure was the incomplete resection rate (IRR). RESULTS: Seven studies that met our study criteria, with a total of 3178 included polyps, were included in our analysis. The incomplete resection rate (IRR) was found to be significantly higher in the CSP group compared to the HSP group (risk ratio [RR] 1.57 [1.17-2.11], P = 0.003). Although the CSP group had a higher local recurrence rate than the HSP group, the difference was not statistically significant (RR: 3.98 [0.66-23.84], P = 0.13). The polyp retrieval rates were not significantly different between the two groups (RR: 1.00 [0.99-1], P = 0.22). Perforation was not reported or mentioned in any of the seven studies. The overall immediate bleeding rate was significantly higher in the CSP group than the HSP group (RR: 2.26 [1.63-3.14], P < 0.001), but immediate postpolypectomy bleeding requiring additional intervention was similar between the groups (RR: 1.08 [0.54-2.17], P = 0.82). The delayed bleeding rate (RR: 0.83 [0.45-1.55], P = 0.56) and specific polypectomy time (RR: -0.46 [-1.05-0.12], P = 0.12) were also similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis shows a significantly higher IRR for CSP compared with HSP when removing small polyps.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pólipos do Colo Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pólipos do Colo Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article