Comparison of clinical efficacy between direct anterior approach and posterolateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical efficacy of the direct anterior approach (DAA) vs. posterolateral approach (PLA) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 382 patients who underwent primary THA in our hospital from March 2016 to March 2021 were identified as research subjects, with 183 patients in the DAA group and 199 in the PLA group. Outcome measures included operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative creatine kinase (CK), Harris score, visual analogue scale (VAS), postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: DAA resulted in significantly longer operative time but lower intraoperative bleeding volume vs. PLA. Three months postoperatively, patients receiving DAA showed significantly lower visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and higher Harris scores than those given PLA. No hip dislocation was observed in the DAA group. CONCLUSIONS: DAA results in less intraoperative hemorrhage and muscle damage, better postoperative recovery, and a lower incidence of hip dislocation.