Supportive mobility devices across the lifespan in Cerebral Palsy: a modified Delphi study to establish stakeholder research priorities.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONRoutine incorporation of stakeholder voices in research and clinical practice can critically inform teams without lived experience of cerebral palsy to co-create meaningful priorities and focus areas for supportive mobility device provision and use from a lived perspective.Stakeholders identified that access to trial equipment, device adaptability, provider knowledge and training, and a focus on the presence or absence of shared decision-making are among the top research priorities when engaging with individuals with cerebral palsy who use supportive mobility devices.Given the heterogeneous nature of cerebral palsy and evolving mobility needs for individuals across different Gross Motor Function Classification System levels, a lifespan perspective and future-oriented approach to supportive mobility device research and clinical practice are crucial to address device design and implementation as well as barriers to quality provision practices.