Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Utilization of donor-derived Cell-Free DNA in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: A single center study.
Ranch, Daniel; Fei, Mingwei; Kincade, Elisabeth; Piburn, Kim; Hitchman, Kelley; Klein, Kelsey.
Afiliação
  • Ranch D; Department of Pediatrics, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
  • Fei M; Biostatistics Department, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Kincade E; University Health Transplant Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
  • Piburn K; Pharmacotherapy Division, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
  • Hitchman K; Department of Pediatrics, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
  • Klein K; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Pediatr Transplant ; 28(1): e14582, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37550268
ABSTRACT
High donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) levels indicate transplant allograft injury and can identify graft rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Here, we evaluated the use of dd-cfDNA in pediatric kidney transplant rejection monitoring and treatment.

METHODS:

Forty-two pediatric kidney transplant patients were enrolled between February 2020 and August 2021. Dd-cfDNA was tested before and after biopsy/rejection treatment. There was a total of 61 allograft biopsies (44 for-cause, 17 surveillance).

RESULTS:

Graft rejection was found in 35/61 biopsies. Rejection was more common in basiliximab induction compared to rATG (77.1% vs. 22.9%, p = .0121). Median dd-cfDNA was higher in those with rejection (1.2% [0.34-3.12] vs. 0.24% [0.08-0.78], p < .0001). Dd-cfDNA was highest in biopsies with AMR and mixed AMR/TCMR. In addition, dd-cfDNA in basiliximab induction was higher compared to rATG (0.92% [0.27-1.8] vs. 0.26% [0.08-2], p = .0437). Median change in dd-cfDNA after rejection treatment was -0.57% (-1.67 to 0.05). Median time to dd-cfDNA <1% post-rejection treatment was 8.5 days (3.0-19.5). Dd-cfDNA in AMR was higher compared to TCMR or mixed rejection, and levels remained higher in AMR after treatment. In surveillance biopsies, 4/17 had rejection. Median dd-cfDNA was not different in those with versus without rejection (0.48% vs. 0.28%, p = .2342). Those without rejection all had dd-cfDNA <1%. In those with rejection, only one patient had dd-cfDNA >1%, and all had TCMR.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings support dd-cfDNA as a useful indicator of graft rejection and response to treatment. Additional studies are needed to determine the role of dd-cfDNA in graft health surveillance.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim / Ácidos Nucleicos Livres Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Transplant Assunto da revista: PEDIATRIA / TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim / Ácidos Nucleicos Livres Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Transplant Assunto da revista: PEDIATRIA / TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos