Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Popliteal tendon impingement as a cause of pain following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.
Finsterwald, Michael A; Lu, Victor; Andronic, Octavian; Prosser, Gareth H; Yates, Piers J; Jones, Christopher W.
Afiliação
  • Finsterwald MA; Department of Orthopaedics, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, 6150, Australia.
  • Lu V; The Orthopaedic Research Foundation of Western Australia (ORFWA), Perth, 6150, Australia.
  • Andronic O; School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SP, UK.
  • Prosser GH; Department of Orthopaedics, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, 6150, Australia. octavian.andronic@balgrist.ch.
  • Yates PJ; The Orthopaedic Research Foundation of Western Australia (ORFWA), Perth, 6150, Australia. octavian.andronic@balgrist.ch.
  • Jones CW; Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. octavian.andronic@balgrist.ch.
Arthroplasty ; 5(1): 45, 2023 Sep 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37661253
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Popliteal tendon impingement (PTI) is an under-recognized cause of persistent pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the systematic review was to summarize and outline successful strategies in the diagnosis and management of PTI.

METHODS:

A systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines was performed for four databases MEDLINE (Pubmed), Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database. It was registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PROSPERO) under the registration number CRD42023398723. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the criteria of the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS).

RESULTS:

A total of 8 studies were included. There were 2 retrospective case series and 6 case reports. The follow-up ranged from 6 to 30 months. Two studies described PTI as an intraoperative phenomenon during TKA with "snapping"; whilst 6 studies described indications and outcomes for arthroscopic tenotomy for PTI following TKA. In making the diagnosis, there was concurrence that the posterolateral pain should be focal and that dynamic ultrasonography and diagnostic injection play an important role. Two specific clinical tests have been described. There was no consistency regarding the need for imaging. There were no reports of instability following popliteal tendon tenotomy or other complications.

CONCLUSION:

PTI should be suspected as a cause for persistent focal pain at the posterolateral knee following TKA. The diagnosis can be suspected on imaging and should be confirmed with dynamic ultrasonography and an ultrasound-guided diagnostic injection. An arthroscopic complete tenotomy of the tendon can reliably alleviate pain and relies on correct diagnosis. There is no evidence for clinically relevant negative biomechanical consequences following tenotomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Systematic Review of Level IV and V studies.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Arthroplasty Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Arthroplasty Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália