Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dosimetric evaluation of a spinal cord dose-limiting 3D-CRT technique for radiotherapy of spinal metastases.
Arnold, Christian Cornelius; Toussaint, André; Mantel, Frederick; Flentje, Michael; Bratengeier, Klaus.
Afiliação
  • Arnold CC; Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Toussaint A; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Mantel F; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Flentje M; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Bratengeier K; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 24(10): e14042, 2023 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37679969
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the possible advantages of a simple spinal cord (SC) dose-limiting three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) technique in comparison to conventional two-dimensional (2D) techniques and other 3D-CRT techniques for spinal bone irradiation. METHODS: For 41 spinal target volumes, seven different techniques were evaluated, using a standard schedule of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The SC dose-limiting 3D-CRT technique 1F2S-18MV using a single posterior field (F) supplemented by two anterior segment fields (S) and 18-MV photon beams was compared to two conventional 2D techniques (a single posterior field, PA, and two opposed anterior-posterior fields, APPA), three other 3D-CRT techniques (a single posterior field supplemented by four segment fields, 1F4S; two wedged fields, WD, and the SC dose-limiting variant using 6 MV, 1F2S-6MV) along with the original clinically applied plans. RESULTS: 1F2S-18MV demonstrated notably better results for all target volume parameters compared to the conventional 2D techniques (p < 0.001). Limitation of the SC dose was significantly superior with 1F2S-18MV in comparison to PA and APPA (SC Dmean: 28.9 ± 0.4  vs. 30.1 ± 0.6 Gy and 30.1 ± 0.4 Gy; SC Dmax: 30.9 ± 0.7  vs. 32.5 ± 1.0 Gy and 31.8 ± 0.7 Gy; SC D1cm3 : 30.1 ± 0.6  vs. 31.7 ± 0.9 Gy and 31.1 ± 0.6 Gy; p < 0.001). Likewise, lower mean SC doses with 1F2S-18MV were observed in comparison to the more treatment time-consuming 3D-CRT techniques (1F4S, WD) and the original plans without relevant compromises on the dose homogeneity in the target volume and the dose exposure to the other OARs. CONCLUSION: In treatment planning of spinal metastases, simple variants of 3D-CRT-techniques like 1F2S-18MV can offer a significant dose limitation to the SC while providing a sufficient dose coverage of the target volume. Especially in patients with favorable life expectancy and potential need for re-irradiation, such SC dose-limiting 3D-CRT techniques may be a reasonable approach.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral / Radioterapia Conformacional / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral / Radioterapia Conformacional / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha