Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Germline BRCA testing in pancreatic cancer: improving awareness, timing, turnaround, and uptake.
Golan, Talia; Casolino, Raffaella; Biankin, Andrew V; Hammel, Pascal; Whitaker, Kristen D; Hall, Michael J; Riegert-Johnson, Douglas L.
Afiliação
  • Golan T; Institute of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer 52621, Israel.
  • Casolino R; Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
  • Biankin AV; Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Hammel P; Department of Medicine, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Whitaker KD; Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Hall MJ; West of Scotland Pancreatic Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
  • Riegert-Johnson DL; South Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, Australia.
Ther Adv Med Oncol ; 15: 17588359231189127, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37720496
ABSTRACT
Prognosis is generally poor for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. However, patients with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations (gBRCAm) may benefit from first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and maintenance therapy with the poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib following at least 16 weeks of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy without disease progression. Germline breast cancer gene (BRCA) testing is therefore important to ensure that patients receive the most effective treatment. In addition, testing for other DNA damage response gene mutations beyond gBRCAm may also guide treatment decisions. However, clinical pathways for genetic testing are often suboptimal, leading to delays in treatment initiation or missed opportunities for personalized therapy. Barriers to testing include low rates of referral and uptake, delays to referral and slow result turnaround times, cost, and biopsy and assay limitations if somatic testing is performed, leading to the requirement for subsequent dedicated germline testing. Low rates of referral may result from lack of awareness among physicians of the clinical value of testing, coupled with low confidence in interpreting test results and poor availability of genetic counseling services. Among patients, barriers to uptake may include similar lack of awareness of the clinical value of testing, anxiety regarding the implications of test results, lack of insurance coverage, fear of negative insurance implications, and socioeconomic factors. Potential solutions include innovative approaches to testing pathways, including 'mainstreaming' of testing in which BRCA tests are routinely arranged by the treating oncologist, with the involvement of genetic counselors if a patient is found to have a gBRCAm. More recently, the utility of multigene panel analyses has also been explored. Access to genetic counseling may also be improved through initiatives such as having a genetic counseling appointment for all new patient visits and telemedicine approaches, including the use of telephone consultations or DVD-assisted counseling. Educational programs will also be beneficial, and cost effectiveness is likely to improve as the number of targeted treatments increases and when the earlier detection of tumors in family members following cascade testing is considered.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ther Adv Med Oncol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Israel

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ther Adv Med Oncol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Israel