Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Whole blood cytokine release assays reveal disparity between capillary blood sampling methods.
Meredith, Rhys T; Yarham, Ross A R; Mills, Hayley; Oliver, Maria A.
Afiliação
  • Meredith RT; InBio, Vision Court, Caxton Place, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
  • Yarham RAR; InBio, Vision Court, Caxton Place, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
  • Mills H; InBio, Vision Court, Caxton Place, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
  • Oliver MA; InBio, Vision Court, Caxton Place, Cardiff, United Kingdom. Electronic address: moliver@inbio.com.
Clin Biochem ; 120: 110648, 2023 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37742868
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The use of whole blood in rapid cytokine release assays (CRAs) is becoming an established technique for screening immune responses following natural infection or vaccination, especially in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Establishing an accurate capillary blood sampling method to replace the need for venipuncture could make CRAs more accessible. In this study, capillary blood was collected via two different methods alongside traditional venipuncture to investigate whether the method of blood draw affects cytokine quantification when performing CRAs.

METHODS:

Adults previously vaccinated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines donated three blood samples one by venipuncture, one by finger prick, and one by a microneedle device. Whole blood was aliquoted and incubated overnight with SARS-CoV-2 peptides or left unstimulated. Cytokine release in plasma was measured by multiplex array.

RESULTS:

In unstimulated samples, little to no cytokines were detected in blood collected via venipuncture or by microneedle devices. Conversely, capillary blood collected by finger prick showed detectable levels of all cytokines analysed, with significantly inflated levels of TNFα, IL-10 (p < 0.0001), IL-2, GM-CSF, and IL-13 (p < 0.01), and 53% of these samples were also positive for IFN-γ. Following peptide stimulation, 25% of samples collected via finger prick showed dysregulated production of IFN-γ, TNFα, IL-2, and IL-10, with lower cytokine production than unstimulated controls. Contrastingly, this was seen in just 4% of venous blood samples and in none of the microneedle samples.

CONCLUSIONS:

Capillary blood draw via a microneedle device results in highly comparable immune responses to those seen via venipuncture at baseline and following peptide stimulation, suggesting this is a viable method for rapid whole blood CRAs. Conversely, differential cytokine production is observed following capillary blood draw via finger prick.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Clin Biochem Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Clin Biochem Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido