Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
TP53 mutation and abnormal p53 expression in endometrial cancer: Associations with race and outcomes.
Whelan, Karley; Dillon, Mairead; Strickland, Kyle C; Pothuri, Bhavana; Bae-Jump, Victoria; Borden, Lindsay E; Thaker, Premal H; Haight, Paulina; Arend, Rebecca C; Ko, Emily; Jackson, Amanda L; Corr, Bradley R; Ayoola-Adeola, Martins; Wright, Jason D; Podwika, Sarah; Smitherman, Carson; Thomas, Samantha; Lightfoot, Michelle; Newton, Meredith; Washington, Christina; Mullen, Mary; Cosgrove, Casey; Harsono, Alfonsus Adrian Hadikusumo; Powell, Kristina; Herzog, Thomas J; Salani, Ritu; Alvarez Secord, Angeles.
Afiliação
  • Whelan K; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Dillon M; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Strickland KC; Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Pothuri B; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
  • Bae-Jump V; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Borden LE; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
  • Thaker PH; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
  • Haight P; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Arend RC; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Ko E; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Jackson AL; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
  • Corr BR; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Health Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Ayoola-Adeola M; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Wright JD; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States.
  • Podwika S; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VI, USA.
  • Smitherman C; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Thomas S; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Lightfoot M; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
  • Newton M; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Washington C; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
  • Mullen M; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
  • Cosgrove C; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Harsono AAH; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Powell K; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Herzog TJ; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
  • Salani R; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Alvarez Secord A; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: angeles.secord@duke.edu.
Gynecol Oncol ; 178: 44-53, 2023 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37748270
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This multi-center cohort study assessed associations between race, TP53 mutations, p53 expression, and histology to investigate racial survival disparities in endometrial cancer (EC).

METHODS:

Black and White patients with advanced or recurrent EC with Next Generation Sequencing data in the Endometrial Cancer Molecularly Targeted Therapy Consortium database were identified. Clinicopathologic and treatment variables were summarized by race and compared. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among all patients were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the association between race, TP53 status, p53 expression, histology, and survival outcomes.

RESULTS:

Black patients were more likely than White patients to have TP53-mutated (N = 727, 71.7% vs 49.7%, p < 0.001) and p53-abnormal (N = 362, 71.1% vs 53.2%, p = 0.003) EC. Patients with TP53-mutated EC had worse PFS (HR 2.73 (95% CI 1.88-3.97)) and OS (HR 2.20 (95% CI 1.77-2.74)) compared to those with TP53-wildtype EC. Patients with p53-abnormal EC had worse PFS (HR 2.01 (95% CI 1.22-3.32)) and OS (HR 1.61 (95% CI 1.18-2.19)) compared to those with p53-wildtype EC. After adjusting for TP53 mutation and p53 expression, race was not associated with survival outcomes. The most frequent TP53 variants were at nucleotide positions R273 (n = 54), R248 (n = 38), and R175 (n = 23), rates of which did not differ by race.

CONCLUSIONS:

Black patients are more likely to have TP53-mutated and p53-abnormal EC, which are associated with worse survival outcomes than TP53- and p53-wildtype EC. The higher frequency of these subtypes among Black patients may contribute to survival disparities.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53 / Neoplasias do Endométrio Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53 / Neoplasias do Endométrio Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos