Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comprehensive evaluation of advanced dose calculation algorithms for brain stereotactic radiosurgery.
Yoon, Jihyung; Jung, Hyunuk; Tanny, Sean M; Lemus, Olga Maria Dona; Milano, Michael T; Hardy, Sara J; Usuki, Kenneth Y; Zheng, Dandan.
Afiliação
  • Yoon J; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
  • Jung H; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
  • Tanny SM; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
  • Lemus OMD; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
  • Milano MT; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
  • Hardy SJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
  • Usuki KY; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
  • Zheng D; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 24(11): e14169, 2023 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37775989
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Accurate dose calculation is important in both target and low dose normal tissue regions for brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). In this study, we aim to evaluate the dosimetric accuracy of the two advanced dose calculation algorithms for brain SRS.

METHODS:

Retrospective clinical case study and phantom study were performed. For the clinical study, 138 SRS patient plans (443 targets) were generated using BrainLab Elements Voxel Monte Carlo (VMC). To evaluate the dose calculation accuracy, the plans were exported into Eclipse and recalculated with Acuros XB (AXB) algorithm with identical beam parameters. The calculated dose at the target center (Dref), dose to 95% target volume (D95), and the average dose to target (Dmean) were compared. Also, the distance from the skull was analyzed. For the phantom study, a cylindrical phantom and a head phantom were used, and the delivered dose was measured by an ion chamber and EBT3 film, respectively, at various locations. The measurement was compared with the calculated doses from VMC and AXB.

RESULTS:

In clinical cases, VMC dose calculations tended to be higher than AXB. It was found that the difference in Dref showed > 5% in some cases for smaller volumes < 0.3 cm3 . Dmean and D95 differences were also higher for small targets. No obvious trend was found between the dose difference and the distance from the skull. In phantom studies, VMC dose was also higher than AXB for smaller targets, and VMC showed better agreement with the measurements than AXB for both point dose and high dose spread.

CONCLUSION:

The two advanced calculation algorithms were extensively compared. For brain SRS, AXB sometimes calculates a noticeable lower target dose for small targets than VMC, and VMC tends to have a slightly closer agreement with measurements than AXB.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiocirurgia / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiocirurgia / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos