Improved Diagnostic Criteria for Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: There is no acceptable maximum wall thickness (MWT) threshold for diagnosing apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (ApHCM), with guidelines referring to ≥15 mm MWT for all hypertrophic cardiomyopathy subtypes. A normal myocardium naturally tapers apically; a fixed diagnostic threshold fails to account for this. Using cardiac magnetic resonance, "relative" ApHCM has been described with typical electrocardiographic features, loss of apical tapering, and cavity obliteration but also with MWT <15 mm. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to define normal apical wall thickness thresholds in healthy subjects and use these to accurately identify ApHCM. METHODS: The following healthy subjects were recruited: healthy UK Biobank imaging substudy subjects (n = 4,112) and an independent healthy volunteer group (n = 489). A clinically defined disease population of 104 ApHCM subjects was enrolled, with 72 overt (MWT ≥15 mm) and 32 relative (MWT <15 mm but typical electrocardiographic/imaging findings) ApHCM subjects. Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived MWT was measured in 16 segments using a published clinically validated machine learning algorithm. Segmental normal reference ranges were created and indexed (for age, sex, and body surface area), and diagnostic performance was assessed. RESULTS: In healthy cohorts, there was no clinically significant age-related difference for apical wall thickness. There were sex-related differences, but these were not clinically significant after indexing to body surface area. Therefore, segmental reference ranges for apical hypertrophy required indexing to body surface area only (not age or sex). The upper limit of normal (the largest of the 4 apical segments measured) corresponded to a maximum apical MWT in healthy subjects of 5.2 to 5.6 mm/m2 with an accuracy of 0.94 (the unindexed equivalent being 11 mm). This threshold was categorized as abnormal in 99% (71/72) of overt ApHCM patients, 78% (25/32) of relative ApHCM patients, 3% (122/4,112) of UK Biobank subjects, and 3% (13/489) of healthy volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: Per-segment indexed apical wall thickness thresholds are highly accurate for detecting apical hypertrophy, providing confidence to the reader to diagnose ApHCM in those not reaching current internationally recognized criteria.