Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Organic law regulating euthanasia: knowledge and involvement of doctors in Spain one year after its implementation.
Pujol-Fontrodona, G; Domínguez-Roldán, J M; Valero, R.
Afiliação
  • Pujol-Fontrodona G; Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, España.
  • Domínguez-Roldán JM; Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, España; Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, España.
  • Valero R; Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, España; Departamento de Cirugía y Especialidades Médico quirúrgicas, Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, España; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CIBERSAM), Madrid, España. Electronic address: rvalero@clinic.cat.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc) ; 223(10): 596-603, 2023 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37898356
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

The Organic Law Regulating Euthanasia (LORE, for its initials in Spanish) came into force in June 2021. This study aims to examine knowledge of the LORE among physicians licensed in Spain as well as their involvement with and the impact of the law.

METHODS:

This work is a descriptive, cross-sectional study conducted by means of a survey. Information was gathered through a self-administered questionnaire.

RESULTS:

The survey was answered by 1446 physicians licensed in Spain. The samples' demographic characteristics were as follows 54.7% were women, the mean age was 52 ±â€¯14 years, and 66.0% worked in a hospital. Catalonia was the autonomous community with the most participants (44.6%). Regarding specialties, anesthesiology and resuscitation had the highest number of participants (21.9%), followed by family and community medicine (18.5%). The LORE was known in detail by 24.3% of physicians, 58.0% had a positive opinion of it, and 31.1% had direct experience with the euthanasia procedure. Practitioners working in the hospital setting perceived the law more favorably compared to those in the primary care setting (62.3% vs. 47.3%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

Most doctors did not have in-depth knowledge of the LORE, although a majority supported its existence, particularly those in hospital medicine. Most physicians who viewed the LORE negatively were male, older, and worked in primary care. A minority of physicians considered registering as conscientious objectors.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Eutanásia / Anestesiologia Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Rev Clin Esp (Barc) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Eutanásia / Anestesiologia Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Rev Clin Esp (Barc) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article