Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Weakly supervised deep learning for diagnosis of multiple vertebral compression fractures in CT.
Choi, Euijoon; Park, Doohyun; Son, Geonhui; Bak, Seongwon; Eo, Taejoon; Youn, Daemyung; Hwang, Dosik.
Afiliação
  • Choi E; Department of Artificial Intelligence, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park D; School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Son G; School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Bak S; Vuno Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Eo T; School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Youn D; School of Management of Technology, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Hwang D; School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. dosik.hwang@yonsei.ac.kr.
Eur Radiol ; 2023 Nov 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37973631
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop a weakly supervised deep learning (DL) model for vertebral-level vertebral compression fracture (VCF) classification using image-level labelled data. METHODS: The training set included 815 patients with normal (n = 507, 62%) or VCFs (n = 308, 38%). Our proposed model was trained on image-level labelled data for vertebral-level classification. Another supervised DL model was trained with vertebral-level labelled data to compare the performance of the proposed model. RESULTS: The test set included 227 patients with normal (n = 117, 52%) or VCFs (n = 110, 48%). For a fair comparison of the two models, we compared sensitivities with the same specificities of the proposed model and the vertebral-level supervised model. The specificity for overall L1-L5 performance was 0.981. The proposed model may outperform the vertebral-level supervised model with sensitivities of 0.770 vs 0.705 (p = 0.080), respectively. For vertebral-level analysis, the specificities for each L1-L5 were 0.974, 0.973, 0.970, 0.991, and 0.995, respectively. The proposed model yielded the same or better sensitivity than the vertebral-level supervised model in L1 (0.750 vs 0.694, p = 0.480), L3 (0.793 vs 0.586, p < 0.05), L4 (0.833 vs 0.667, p = 0.480), and L5 (0.600 vs 0.600, p = 1.000), respectively. The proposed model showed lower sensitivity than the vertebral-level supervised model for L2, but there was no significant difference (0.775 vs 0.825, p = 0.617). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed model may have a comparable or better performance than the supervised model in vertebral-level VCF classification. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Vertebral-level vertebral compression fracture classification aids in devising patient-specific treatment plans by identifying the precise vertebrae affected by compression fractures. KEY POINTS: • Our proposed weakly supervised method may have comparable or better performance than the supervised method for vertebral-level vertebral compression fracture classification. • The weakly supervised model could have classified cases with multiple vertebral compression fractures at the vertebral-level, even if the model was trained with image-level labels. • Our proposed method could help reduce radiologists' labour because it enables vertebral-level classification from image-level labels.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article