Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is auditory processing measured by the N100 an endophenotype for psychosis? A family study and a meta-analysis.
Wang, Baihan; Otten, Leun J; Schulze, Katja; Afrah, Hana; Varney, Lauren; Cotic, Marius; Saadullah Khani, Noushin; Linden, Jennifer F; Kuchenbaecker, Karoline; McQuillin, Andrew; Hall, Mei-Hua; Bramon, Elvira.
Afiliação
  • Wang B; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
  • Otten LJ; Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Schulze K; Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.
  • Afrah H; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Varney L; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
  • Cotic M; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
  • Saadullah Khani N; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
  • Linden JF; Department of Genetics & Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
  • Kuchenbaecker K; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
  • McQuillin A; Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK.
  • Hall MH; Department of Neuroscience, Physiology & Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK.
  • Bramon E; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Psychol Med ; : 1-14, 2023 Nov 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37997703
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The N100, an early auditory event-related potential, has been found to be altered in patients with psychosis. However, it is unclear if the N100 is a psychosis endophenotype that is also altered in the relatives of patients.

METHODS:

We conducted a family study using the auditory oddball paradigm to compare the N100 amplitude and latency across 243 patients with psychosis, 86 unaffected relatives, and 194 controls. We then conducted a systematic review and a random-effects meta-analysis pooling our results and 14 previously published family studies. We compared data from a total of 999 patients, 1192 relatives, and 1253 controls in order to investigate the evidence and degree of N100 differences.

RESULTS:

In our family study, patients showed reduced N100 amplitudes and prolonged N100 latencies compared to controls, but no significant differences were found between unaffected relatives and controls. The meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction of the N100 amplitude and delay of the N100 latency in both patients with psychosis (standardized mean difference [s.m.d.] = -0.48 for N100 amplitude and s.m.d. = 0.43 for N100 latency) and their relatives (s.m.d. = - 0.19 for N100 amplitude and s.m.d. = 0.33 for N100 latency). However, only the N100 latency changes in relatives remained significant when excluding studies with affected relatives.

CONCLUSIONS:

N100 changes, especially prolonged N100 latencies, are present in both patients with psychosis and their relatives, making the N100 a promising endophenotype for psychosis. Such changes in the N100 may reflect changes in early auditory processing underlying the etiology of psychosis.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Psychol Med Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Psychol Med Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido