Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of spinal manipulation in influencing the autonomic nervous system - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kovanur Sampath, Kesava; Tumilty, Steve; Wooten, Liana; Belcher, Suzie; Farrell, Gerard; Gisselman, Angela Spontelli.
Afiliação
  • Kovanur Sampath K; Centre for Health and Social Practice, Waikato Institute of Technology, Te Pukenga, Hamilton, New Zealand.
  • Tumilty S; Faculty of Health, Bruce ACT, University of Canberra, Australia.
  • Wooten L; Centre for Health, Activity, and Rehabilitation Research (CHARR), School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
  • Belcher S; Physical Therapy Program - Phoenix, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, School of Medicine, Tufts University, Phoenix, United States of America.
  • Farrell G; Centre for Health and Social Practice, Waikato Institute of Technology, Te Pukenga, Hamilton, New Zealand.
  • Gisselman AS; Centre for Health, Activity, and Rehabilitation Research (CHARR), School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
J Man Manip Ther ; 32(1): 10-27, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38044657
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Spinal manipulation (SM) has been hypothesized to influence the autonomic nervous system (ANS). Further, it has been proposed that the effects may vary depending on the segment manipulated. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the current level of evidence for SM in influencing the ANS in healthy and/or symptomatic population.

METHODS:

Various databases (n = 8) were searched (inception till May 2023) and 14 trials (n = 618 participants) were included in the review. Two authors independently screened, extracted and assessed the risk of bias in included studies. The data were synthesized using standard mean differences and meta-analysis for the primary outcome measures. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used for assessing the quality of the body of evidence for each outcome of interest.

RESULTS:

Overall, there was low quality evidence that SM did not influence any measure of ANS including heart rate variability (HRV), oxy-hemoglobin, blood pressure, epinephrine and nor-epinephrine. However, there was low quality evidence that cervical spine manipulation may influence high frequency parameter of HRV, indicating its influence on the parasympathetic nervous system.

CONCLUSION:

When compared with control or sham interventions, SM did not alter the ANS. Due to invalid methodologies and the low quality of included studies, findings must be interpreted with great caution. Future studies are needed which employ rigorous data collection processes to verify the true physiological implications of SM on ANS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sistema Nervoso Autônomo / Manipulação da Coluna Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Man Manip Ther Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Zelândia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sistema Nervoso Autônomo / Manipulação da Coluna Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Man Manip Ther Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Zelândia