Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Closing the birth registration gap for Every newborn facility birth: literature review and qualitative research.
Paleker, Masudah; Boggs, Dorothy; Jackson, Debra; Day, Louise-Tina; Lawn, Joy E.
Afiliação
  • Paleker M; Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  • Boggs D; Western Cape Government: Health, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Jackson D; Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  • Day LT; International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  • Lawn JE; Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Glob Health Action ; 16(1): 2286073, 2023 Dec 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38085000
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Birth registration is vital to provide legal identity and access to essential services. Worldwide, approximately 166 million children under five years (just under 25%) are unregistered, yet >80% of all births occur in health facilities in most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).

OBJECTIVES:

This study, conducted in association with UNICEF, aims to review facility-based birth registration initiatives, and provide recommendations to close the gap between facility birth and birth registration rates in LMIC.

METHODS:

A literature review covering published and grey literature was conducted to identify facility-based initiatives to increase birth registration rates. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted by audio-call with six key global stakeholders to identify additional initiatives, and further insights for barriers and enablers to close the gap.

RESULTS:

Academic databases and grey literature search yielded 21 studies meeting pre-specified inclusion criteria. Nine barriers preventing birth registration were identified and grouped into three themes health system, governmental, and societal barriers. Facility-based birth registration initiatives resulted in an increase in birth registration rates. Importantly, health promotion within communities also increased demand for birth registration. In-depth interview respondents provided further detail and supported data found in literature review. Synthesis of the literature and stakeholder interviews noted enablers including inter-sectoral collaboration between health sector and civil registration ministries e.g., placing civil registration offices in health facilities or allowing medical doctors to act as registrars.

CONCLUSION:

Facility-based birth registration initiatives can increase birth registration rates in LMIC. Initiatives need to address both supply and demand side of birth registration to improve facility-based birth registration rates. A multi-sectoral approach within governments, and alignment with multiple stakeholders is vital.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Coeficiente de Natalidade Limite: Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: Glob Health Action Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Coeficiente de Natalidade Limite: Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: Glob Health Action Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido