Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Redefining the role of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in cervical cancer treatment using a preplanned approach.
Annede, Pierre; Robert, Charlotte; Espenel, Sophie; Dumas, Isabelle; Chargari, Cyrus.
Afiliação
  • Annede P; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Center, Villejuif, France; Saint Louis Radiation Oncology Centre, Toulon, France. Electronic address: pierreannede@gmail.com.
  • Robert C; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Center, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, Villejuif, France.
  • Espenel S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Center, Villejuif, France.
  • Dumas I; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Center, Villejuif, France.
  • Chargari C; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Center, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, Villejuif, France.
Brachytherapy ; 23(2): 107-114, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38105154
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

This study aims to determine predictive factors for cervical cancer patients who would benefit more from high-dose-rate (HDR) or pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy.

METHODS:

The sample included 50 patients treated with brachytherapy following external radiochemotherapy. PDR plans were compared to HDR preplans, with a focus on patients who may benefit from PDR using preplan metrics and clinical variables. The expected clinical effect was quantified using a tumor control probability model.

RESULTS:

Results showed PDR plans with 60 pulses to be optimal for achieving target clinical goals for D90CTVHR. A CTVHR volume of >67.5cc and/or D90CTVHR dose on the HDR preplan of <31.1 Gy was the strongest indicator for patient selection who would gain >3% increase in TCP with PDR. The process showed 96% accuracy, 88% sensitivity, and 98% specificity. Only 16% of patients showed a relevant benefit from PDR over HDR, with a mean D90CTVHR of 7 Gy higher and a mean TCP at 3 years of 4.8% higher for PDR. The benefit of PDR is highly influenced by the choice of alpha/beta ratio and repair halftime.

CONCLUSION:

A small subset of cervical cancer patients may gain from PDR over HDR. CTVHR volume and preplan D90CTVHR doses may be useful in selecting patients for PDR brachytherapy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Braquiterapia / Neoplasias do Colo do Útero Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Brachytherapy Assunto da revista: RADIOTERAPIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Braquiterapia / Neoplasias do Colo do Útero Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Brachytherapy Assunto da revista: RADIOTERAPIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article