Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of adverse childhood experience training, screening, and response in primary care: a systematic review.
McBain, Ryan K; Levin, Jonathan S; Matthews, Samantha; Qureshi, Nabeel; Long, Dayna; Schickedanz, Adam B; Gilgoff, Rachel; Kotz, Krista; Slavich, George M; Eberhart, Nicole K.
Afiliação
  • McBain RK; Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Levin JS; Division of Healthcare Delivery, RAND Corporation, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Matthews S; Division of Healthcare Delivery, RAND Corporation, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Qureshi N; Division of Healthcare Delivery, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
  • Long D; Division of Healthcare Delivery, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
  • Schickedanz AB; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Gilgoff R; Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine and Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Kotz K; UCLA-UCSF ACEs Aware Family Resilience Network, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Slavich GM; UCLA-UCSF ACEs Aware Family Resilience Network, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Eberhart NK; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
EClinicalMedicine ; 65: 102282, 2023 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38106557
ABSTRACT

Background:

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) can have harmful, long-term health effects. Although primary care providers (PCPs) could help mitigate these effects, no studies have reviewed the impacts of ACE training, screening, and response in primary care.

Methods:

This systematic review searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL) for peer-reviewed articles on ACE training, screening, and/or response in primary care published between Jan 1, 1998, and May 31, 2023. Searches were limited to primary research articles in the primary care setting that reported provider-related outcomes (knowledge, confidence, screening behavior, clinical care) and/or patient-related outcomes (satisfaction, referral engagement, health outcomes). Summary data were extracted from published reports.

Findings:

Of 6532 records, 58 met inclusion criteria. Fifty-two reported provider-related outcomes; 21 reported patient-related outcomes. 50 included pediatric populations, 12 included adults. A majority discussed screening interventions (n = 40). Equal numbers (n = 25) discussed training and clinical response interventions. Strength of evidence (SOE) was generally low, especially for adult studies. This was due to reliance on observational evidence, small samples, and self-report measures for heterogeneous outcomes. Exceptions with moderate SOE included the effect of training interventions on provider confidence/self-efficacy and the effect of screening interventions on screening uptake and patient satisfaction.

Interpretation:

Primary care represents a potentially strategic setting for addressing ACEs, but evidence on patient- and provider-related outcomes remains scarce.

Funding:

The California Department of Health Care Services and the Office of the California Surgeon General.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: EClinicalMedicine Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: EClinicalMedicine Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos