Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of remote audio-visual system versus standard onsite buddy system to monitor the doffing of personal protective equipment during COVID-19 pandemic: An observational study.
Lazar, Michelle Shirin; Ganesh, Venkata; Naik B, Naveen; Singh, Ajay; Puri, G D; Kaur, Sukhpal.
Afiliação
  • Lazar MS; Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
  • Ganesh V; Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
  • Naik B N; Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
  • Singh A; Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
  • Puri GD; Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
  • Kaur S; National Institute of Nursing Education, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Int J Health Plann Manage ; 39(2): 530-540, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38163283
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Literature states a higher self-contamination rate among healthcare workers (HCWs) while doffing personal protective equipment (PPE). During the Covid-19 pandemic, onsite trained observers were not always available to monitor PPE compliance. The remote audio-visual doffing surveillance (RADS) system has the potential to overcome this limitation. We aimed to compare the efficacy of this real-time RADS system against the onsite buddy system for monitoring the doffing of PPE.

METHODS:

This prospective, observational study was carried out at our tertiary care centre in northern India. 200 HCWs who cared for Covid-19 patients in the intensive care units/operation theatres were included. Group A included HCWs who performed doffing with the help of an onsite trained observer and group B included HCWs who performed doffing with the RADS system. An independent observer noted the error at any step using the CDC doffing checklist, in both groups. An online questionnaire to analyse the level of satisfaction post-doffing was also surveyed.

RESULTS:

The proportion of errors committed during doffing was significantly lower in group B compared to group A with a low relative risk of 0.34 (95% CI 0.22-0.51) (p < 0.001) (Figure 1A,B). In both groups, there was no difference in HCWs feedback regarding the ease of the system and fear of committing an error. Though the perceived quality of monitoring was felt better with onsite buddy, the overall confidence rating of being safe after doffing was better with the RADS system.

CONCLUSION:

Real-time RADS system may be more effective than the onsite buddy system for ensuring the safety of HCWs during doffing PPE. HCWs level of satisfaction related to the ease and anxiety with the monitoring systems were comparable. RADS system can reduce reliance on HCW resources and can integrate well into existing healthcare systems.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Health Plann Manage Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Health Plann Manage Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia