Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety of e-cigarettes and nicotine patches as stop-smoking aids in pregnancy: Secondary analysis of the Pregnancy Trial of E-cigarettes and Patches (PREP) randomized controlled trial.
Pesola, Francesca; Smith, Katie Myers; Phillips-Waller, Anna; Przulj, Dunja; Griffiths, Christopher; Walton, Robert; McRobbie, Hayden; Coleman, Tim; Lewis, Sarah; Whitemore, Rachel; Clark, Miranda; Ussher, Michael; Sinclair, Lesley; Seager, Emily; Cooper, Sue; Bauld, Linda; Naughton, Felix; Sasieni, Peter; Manyonda, Isaac; Hajek, Peter.
Afiliação
  • Pesola F; Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Smith KM; Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Phillips-Waller A; Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Przulj D; Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Griffiths C; Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Walton R; Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • McRobbie H; National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
  • Coleman T; Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Lewis S; Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Whitemore R; Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Clark M; Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Ussher M; Division of Population Health Sciences and Education, St George's, University of London and Institute of Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
  • Sinclair L; Usher Institute and SPECTRUM Consortium, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Seager E; Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Cooper S; Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Bauld L; Usher Institute and SPECTRUM Consortium, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Naughton F; School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
  • Sasieni P; Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Manyonda I; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Hajek P; Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Addiction ; 119(5): 875-884, 2024 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38229538
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

The aim of this study was to examine the safety of e-cigarettes (EC) and nicotine patches (NRT) when used to help pregnant smokers quit.

DESIGN:

A recent trial of EC versus NRT reported safety outcomes in the randomized arms. We conducted a further analysis based on product use.

SETTING:

Twenty-three hospitals in England and a stop-smoking service in Scotland took part.

PARTICIPANTS:

The participants comprised 1140 pregnant smokers.

INTERVENTIONS:

We compared women using and not using EC and NRT regularly during pregnancy. MEASUREMENTS Measurements included nicotine intake compared with baseline, birth weight, other pregnancy outcomes, adverse events, maternal respiratory symptoms and relapse in early abstainers.

FINDINGS:

Use of EC was more common than use of NRT (47.3% vs 21.6%, P < 0.001). Women who stopped smoking (abstainers) and used EC at the end-of-pregnancy (EOP) reduced their salivary cotinine by 45% [49.3 ng/ml, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -79.8 to -10]. Only one abstainer used NRT at EOP. In dual users, cotinine increased by 19% (24 ng/ml, 95% CI = 3.5-68). In women reporting a reduction of at least 50% in cigarette consumption, cotinine levels increased by 10% in those using nicotine products and by 9% in those who did not. Birth weights in dual users and exclusive smokers were the same (3.1 kg). Birth weight in abstainers using either nicotine product was higher than in smokers [3.3 kg, standard deviation (SD) = 0.7] versus 3.1 kg, SD = 0.6; difference = 0.15 kg, 95% CI = 0.05-0.25) and not different from abstainers not using nicotine products (3.1 kg, SD = 0.8). Abstainers and smokers using nicotine products had no worse pregnancy outcomes or more adverse events than abstainers and smokers not using them. EC users reported more improvements than non-users in cough [adjusted relative risk (aRR) = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.37-0.93] and phlegm (aRR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.31-0.92), controlling for smoking status. EC or NRT use had no association with relapse.

CONCLUSIONS:

Regular use of e-cigarettes or nicotine patches by pregnant smokers does not appear to be associated with any adverse outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar / Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Addiction Assunto da revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar / Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Addiction Assunto da revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido