Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The use of information technology to improve interdisciplinary communication during infectious diseases ward rounds on the paediatric intensive care unit.
Willems, Jef; Heyndrickx, Adeline; Schelstraete, Petra; Gadeyne, Bram; De Cock, Pieter; Vandendriessche, Stien; Depuydt, Pieter.
Afiliação
  • Willems J; Department of Critical Care, Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Ghent University Hospital, 1K12-D, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. jef.willems@ugent.be.
  • Heyndrickx A; Department of Paediatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Schelstraete P; Department of Paediatrics, Paediatric Pneumology and Infectious Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Gadeyne B; Department of Critical Care, Intensive Care Unit, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
  • De Cock P; Department of Pharmacy, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Vandendriessche S; Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Depuydt P; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical Microbiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 1657, 2024 01 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38238516
ABSTRACT
Prospective audit with feedback during infectious diseases ward rounds (IDWR) is a common antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) practice on the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). These interdisciplinary meetings rely on the quality of handover, with high risk of omission of information. We developed an electronic platform integrating infection-related patient data (COSARAPed). In the mixed PICU of a Belgian tertiary hospital we conducted an observational prospective cohort study comparing patient handovers during IDWRs using the COSARAPed-platform to those with access only to conventional resources. The quality of handover was investigated directly by assessment if the narrative was in accordance with Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation principles and if adequate demonstration of diagnostic information occurred, and also indirectly by registration if this was only achieved after intervention by the non-presenting AMS team members. We also recorded all AMS-recommendations. During a 6-month study period, 24 IDWRs and 82 patient presentations were assessed. We could only find a statistically significant advantage in favor of COSARAPed by indirect evaluation. We registered 92 AMS-recommendations, mainly resulting in reduced antibiotic pressure. We concluded that the IDWR is an appropriate platform for AMS on the PICU and that the utilisation of COSARAPed may enhance the quality of patient handover.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Transmissíveis / Tecnologia da Informação Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Transmissíveis / Tecnologia da Informação Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica