Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biomechanical Effects of Subtalar Joint Fusion and Medial Ligament Reconstruction in Simulated Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity.
Lee, Wonyong; Tecle, Nahom; Knapp, Emma; Awad, Hani; Oh, Irvin.
Afiliação
  • Lee W; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Guthrie Clinic, Sayre, PA, USA.
  • Tecle N; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Knapp E; Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Awad H; Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Oh I; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Foot Ankle Int ; 45(3): 279-290, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38240174
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The purpose of this study is to investigate the biomechanical effect of medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy (MDCO), subtalar joint fusion (SF), and medial ligament reconstruction (MLR deltoid-spring ligament) in a severe flatfoot model. We hypothesized that (1) combination of MDCO and SF improves the tibiotalar and foot alignment in severe progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) cadaver model. (2) However, if a residual valgus heel alignment remains after MCDO and SF, it can lead to increased medial ligament strain, foot malalignment, and tibiotalar valgus tilt, which will be mitigated by the addition of MLR.

METHODS:

Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric foot specimens were used to create a severe flatfoot model. The foot alignment changes, including the talo-first metatarsal angle in the axial and sagittal planes, subtalar angle, and tibiotalar angle in the coronal plane, were measured. The angles were measured at the initial condition, after creating the severe flatfoot model, and after each successive reconstructive procedure in the following order (1) MDCO, (2) SF, and (3) MLR.

RESULTS:

Tibiotalar valgus tilt was decreased with the MDCO procedure 4.4 vs 1.0 degrees (P = .04). Adding in situ SF to the MDCO led to increased tibiotalar tilt to 2.5 degrees was different from the initial condition (P = .01). Although the tibiotalar valgus tilt was significantly decreased after adding the MLR to the MDCO/SF procedure compared with the severe flatfoot model (0.8 vs 4.4 degrees, P = .03), no significant difference in the tibiotalar valgus tilt was observed between MDCO/SF and MDCO/SF with MLR.

CONCLUSION:

Our results demonstrated that MDCO significantly improved forefoot abduction and medial arch alignment, with no significant additional improvement observed with addition of SF. Following SF, a residual valgus heel alignment can contribute to subsequent tibiotalar valgus tilt. The addition of MLR did not show significantly decreased tibiotalar valgus tilt following SF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Residual valgus heel alignment after subtalar joint fusion in the surgical treatment of PCFD can lead to increased medial ligament strain. Although MLR might be considered for providing medial stability, it may not necessarily prevent the development of tibiotalar valgus tilt.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Deformidades do Pé / Articulação Talocalcânea / Pé Chato Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Foot Ankle Int Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Deformidades do Pé / Articulação Talocalcânea / Pé Chato Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Foot Ankle Int Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos